4 600+ tyres 100+ tests 460 000+ prices tracked

Comparison Bridgestone BLIZZAK LM001 vs Bridgestone LM005DG

7.0 Winter
LM001E
Bridgestone
225/40R18 92V BRIDGESTONE BLIZZAK LM001 ,XL ,RP ,RFT ,* ,3PMSF
Passenger car Standard-sport
Rolling resistance C Wet grip B Noise B
from 145 €
9.2 Winter
LM005
Bridgestone
225/40R18 92V BRIDGESTONE LM005DG XL RP RFT
Passenger car Standard-sport
Rolling resistance D Wet grip A Noise B
from 139 €
7.0 LM001E LM001E from 145 €
9.2 LM005 LM005 from 139 €
Overall rating
PTI – Pneutesty Index
7,0
9,2
Price from
145 €
139 € ▲ cheapest
EU label
Rolling resistance C Wet grip B Noise B
Rolling resistance D Wet grip A Noise B
Tyre profiles
Snow Wet Dry Economy Noise and comfort best of the selected middle of the selected Bridgestone LM001E – Snow Bridgestone LM001E – Wet Bridgestone LM001E – Dry Bridgestone LM001E – Economy Bridgestone LM001E – Noise and comfort Bridgestone LM005 – Snow Bridgestone LM005 – Wet Bridgestone LM005 – Dry Bridgestone LM005 – Economy Bridgestone LM005 – Noise and comfort

Click on a tyre name in the chart to hide or show it. The axis compares only the selected tyres with each other — the edge represents the best of them. The shape here doesn't indicate how a tyre performs overall, but which of the selected ones is better.

Discipline comparison
Snow
29 −2 %
2 Tests from braking and handling only
66 +2 % ▲
34 tests
what it consists of Snow (3)
snow braking
31 −3 %
2 Tests
82 +3 % ▲
30 tests
snow traction
– Not measured.
71 +2 %
26 tests
snow handling
35 ≈ average
2 Tests
58 ≈ average ▲
25 tests
Wet
52 +4 %
2 Tests
98 +11 % ▲
34 tests
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking
55 +4 %
2 Tests
100 +15 % ▲
29 tests
Aquaplaning
63 +6 %
2 Tests
91 +10 % ▲
28 tests
wet handling
52 ≈ average
2 Tests
98 +4 % ▲
25 tests
Dry
46 ≈ average
2 Tests
66 ≈ average ▲
28 tests
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking
42 ≈ average
2 Tests
59 ≈ average ▲
28 tests
dry handling
58 ≈ average
2 Tests
88 ≈ average ▲
24 tests
Ice
– Not measured.
– Not measured.
3 Tests
Economy
58 ≈ average ▲
2 Tests no wear measurement
54 −4 %
29 tests
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)
58 ≈ average
2 Tests
95 +7 % ▲
28 tests
durability (wear and abrasion)
– Not measured.
15 −17 %
9 tests weakness
Noise and comfort
27 ≈ average
2 Tests noise only
96 ≈ average ▲
28 tests
what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)
quietness (measured and subjective noise)
47 ≈ average ▲
2 Tests
32 ≈ average
26 tests
ride comfort
– Not measured.
71 Not measured.
Technologies
3PMSF 3PMSF
✓
✓
M+S M+S
✓
✓
Rim protection Rim protection
✓
✓
ROF ROF
✓
✓
Reinforced profile Reinforced profile
✓
✓
OE OE
✓ this one only
–
Comparison

Technologies

Highlighted in green — this tyre has these in addition to the others; grey ones are shared by all.

3PMSF 3PMSF M+S M+S Rim protection Rim protection ROF (run-flat technology) ROF Reinforced profile Reinforced profile OE OE
3PMSF 3PMSF M+S M+S Rim protection Rim protection ROF (run-flat technology) ROF Reinforced profile Reinforced profile
Comparison

Tyre profiles

The shape will show at a glance which of the selected tyres is stronger in which aspect.

Snow Wet Dry Economy Noise and comfort best of the selected middle of the selected Bridgestone LM001E – Snow Bridgestone LM001E – Wet Bridgestone LM001E – Dry Bridgestone LM001E – Economy Bridgestone LM001E – Noise and comfort Bridgestone LM005 – Snow Bridgestone LM005 – Wet Bridgestone LM005 – Dry Bridgestone LM005 – Economy Bridgestone LM005 – Noise and comfort

Click on a tyre name in the chart to hide or show it. The axis compares only the selected tyres with each other — the edge represents the best of them. The shape here doesn't indicate how a tyre performs overall, but which of the selected ones is better.

Comparison

Discipline comparison

A higher number and a longer line always mean a better tyre — also for noise (quieter), consumption (more efficient) and wear (lasts longer). PTI compared with all winter tyres · rank in size 225/40 R18 among 53 available

For example, wet braking, aquaplaning, and handling — showing what makes up the category score.

Snow

Bridgestone LM001E from 4 measurements · 2 tests from braking and handling only
beats 18 of 63
29 −1,5 %
🏆 Bridgestone LM005 from 94 measurements · 34 tests
beats 41 of 63
66 +2,0 %

Bridgestone LM005 is the best.

Subcategories snow

snow braking

Bridgestone LM001E 2 tests
beats 18 of 63
31 −2,6 %
🏆 Bridgestone LM005 30 tests
beats 46 of 63
82 +3,0 %

snow traction

Bridgestone LM001E
– Not measured.
Bridgestone LM005 26 tests
beats 33 of 54
71 +1,9 %

snow handling

Bridgestone LM001E 2 tests
beats 20 of 57
35 ≈ average
🏆 Bridgestone LM005 25 tests
beats 30 of 57
58 ≈ average

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.

Wet

Bridgestone LM001E from 6 measurements · 2 tests
beats 37 of 72
52 +4,0 %
🏆 Bridgestone LM005 from 116 measurements · 34 tests
beats 70 of 72
98 +10,8 %

Bridgestone LM005 is the best.

Subcategories wet

wet braking

Bridgestone LM001E 2 tests
beats 35 of 72
55 +4,2 %
🏆 Bridgestone LM005 29 tests
beats 71 of 72
100 +14,5 %

Aquaplaning

Bridgestone LM001E 2 tests
beats 33 of 59
63 +5,7 %
🏆 Bridgestone LM005 28 tests
beats 51 of 59
91 +9,5 %

wet handling

Bridgestone LM001E 2 tests
beats 30 of 58
52 ≈ average
🏆 Bridgestone LM005 25 tests
beats 56 of 58
98 +3,8 %

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.

Dry

Bridgestone LM001E from 4 measurements · 2 tests
beats 26 of 58
46 ≈ average
🏆 Bridgestone LM005 from 52 measurements · 28 tests
beats 38 of 58
66 ≈ average

Bridgestone LM005 is the best.

Subcategories dry

dry braking

Bridgestone LM001E 2 tests
beats 20 of 58
42 ≈ average
🏆 Bridgestone LM005 28 tests
beats 31 of 58
59 ≈ average

dry handling

Bridgestone LM001E 2 tests
beats 30 of 54
58 ≈ average
🏆 Bridgestone LM005 24 tests
beats 45 of 54
88 ≈ average

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.

Economy

🏆 Bridgestone LM001E from 2 measurements · 2 tests no wear measurement
beats 33 of 58
58 ≈ average
Bridgestone LM005 from 40 measurements · 29 tests
beats 31 of 58
54 −4,4 %

Bridgestone LM001E is the best.

Subcategories economy

efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)

Bridgestone LM001E 2 tests
beats 31 of 57
58 ≈ average
🏆 Bridgestone LM005 28 tests
beats 53 of 57
95 +7,1 %

durability (wear and abrasion)

Bridgestone LM001E
– Not measured.
Bridgestone LM005 9 tests
beats 7 of 49
15 −17,4 %

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.

Noise and comfort

Bridgestone LM001E from 2 measurements · 2 tests noise only
beats 15 of 58
27 ≈ average
🏆 Bridgestone LM005 from 26 measurements · 28 tests
beats 55 of 58
96 ≈ average

Bridgestone LM005 is the best.

Subcategories noise and comfort

quietness (measured and subjective noise)

🏆 Bridgestone LM001E 2 tests
beats 28 of 57
47 ≈ average
Bridgestone LM005 26 tests
beats 23 of 57
32 ≈ average

ride comfort

Bridgestone LM001E
– Not measured.
Bridgestone LM005
beats 23 of 34
71 Not measured.

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.