Comparison Bridgestone Lm22 vs Bridgestone BLIZZAK LM001

Bridgestone

225/50r17 94h Bridgestone Lm22 Rof

Passenger car

Bridgestone

225/50R17 98H BRIDGESTONE BLIZZAK LM001 ,XL ,RFT ,* ,3PMSF

Passenger car Standard-sport

from 161 €

Lm22

LM001E from 161 €

Overall rating

PTI – Pneutesty Index

–

7,0

Price from

–

161 € ▲ cheapest

EU label

Discipline comparison

Snow

–

27 −1 %

2 Tests from braking and handling only

what it consists of Snow (2)

snow braking

–

31 −3 %

2 Tests

snow handling

–

35 ≈ average

2 Tests

Wet

–

53 +4 %

2 Tests

what it consists of Wet (3)

wet braking

–

55 +4 %

2 Tests

Aquaplaning

–

63 +6 %

2 Tests

wet handling

–

52 ≈ average

2 Tests

Dry

–

49 ≈ average

2 Tests

what it consists of Dry (2)

dry braking

–

42 ≈ average

2 Tests

dry handling

–

58 ≈ average

2 Tests

Ice

–

– Not measured.

Economy

–

57 ≈ average

2 Tests no wear measurement

what it consists of Economy (1)

efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)

–

58 ≈ average

2 Tests

Noise and comfort

–

29 ≈ average

2 Tests noise only

what it consists of Noise and comfort (1)

quietness (measured and subjective noise)

–

47 ≈ average

2 Tests

Technologies

3PMSF

✓

M+S

✓

ROF

✓

–

✓ this one only

Reinforced profile

–

✓ this one only

Comparison

Technologies

Highlighted in green — this tyre has these in addition to the others; grey ones are shared by all.

3PMSF

M+S

ROF

3PMSF

M+S

ROF

Comparison

Discipline comparison

A higher number and a longer line always mean a better tyre — also for noise (quieter), consumption (more efficient) and wear (lasts longer). PTI compared with all winter tyres · rank in size 225/50 R17 among 55 available

For example, wet braking, aquaplaning, and handling — showing what makes up the category score.

Snow

Bridgestone Lm22

Not measured.

Bridgestone LM001E from 4 measurements · 2 tests from braking and handling only

−1,4 %

Subcategories snow

snow braking

Bridgestone Lm22

Not measured.

Bridgestone LM001E 2 tests

−2,6 %

snow handling

Bridgestone Lm22

Not measured.

Bridgestone LM001E 2 tests

≈ average

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.

Wet

Bridgestone Lm22

Not measured.

Bridgestone LM001E from 6 measurements · 2 tests

+4,4 %

Subcategories wet

wet braking

Bridgestone Lm22

Not measured.

Bridgestone LM001E 2 tests

+4,2 %

Aquaplaning

Bridgestone Lm22

Not measured.

Bridgestone LM001E 2 tests

+5,7 %

wet handling

Bridgestone Lm22

Not measured.

Bridgestone LM001E 2 tests

≈ average

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.

Dry

Bridgestone Lm22

Not measured.

Bridgestone LM001E from 4 measurements · 2 tests

≈ average

Subcategories dry

dry braking

Bridgestone Lm22

Not measured.

Bridgestone LM001E 2 tests

≈ average

dry handling

Bridgestone Lm22

Not measured.

Bridgestone LM001E 2 tests

≈ average

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.

Economy

Bridgestone Lm22

Not measured.

Bridgestone LM001E from 2 measurements · 2 tests no wear measurement

≈ average

Subcategories economy

efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)

Bridgestone Lm22

Not measured.

Bridgestone LM001E 2 tests

≈ average

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.

Noise and comfort

Bridgestone Lm22

Not measured.

Bridgestone LM001E from 2 measurements · 2 tests noise only

≈ average

Subcategories noise and comfort

quietness (measured and subjective noise)

Bridgestone Lm22

Not measured.

Bridgestone LM001E 2 tests

≈ average

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.