20 000+ reviews 4 600+ tyres 140+ tests 480 000+ prices tracked

Comparison Continental WinterContact TS 860 vs Continental WINTERCONTACT TS 870

Overall rating
PTI – Pneutesty Index
8,4
9,6
Discipline comparison
Snow
75 +2 %
7 tests
84 +3 % ▲
18 tests
what it consists of Snow (3)
snow braking
78 +2 %
7 tests
86 +3 % ▲
16 tests
snow traction
44 −1 %
3 Tests
63 +2 % ▲
15 tests
snow handling
82 +1 %
5 tests
93 +3 % ▲
11 tests
Wet
94 +8 %
7 tests
97 +10 % ▲
17 tests
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking
88 +7 %
7 tests
97 +10 % ▲
15 tests
Aquaplaning
88 +10 %
7 tests
99 +10 % ▲
14 tests
wet handling
94 +4 %
5 tests
96 +4 % ▲
10 tests
Dry
66 ≈ average
6 tests
89 +2 % ▲
15 tests
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking
54 ≈ average
7 tests
84 +2 % ▲
15 tests
dry handling
77 ≈ average
4 Tests
94 ≈ average ▲
9 tests
Ice
34 −5 %
1 test 1 test
88 +5 % ▲
6 tests
what it consists of Ice (3)
ice braking
36 −4 %
2 Tests
90 +6 % ▲
6 tests
ice traction
11 −6 %
2 Tests
15 −21 % ▲
2 Tests weakness
ice handling
– ≈ average
1 test 1 test
6 −6 %
‹
2 Tests weakness
Economy
83 +4 %
6 tests
92 +8 % ▲
14 tests
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)
76 +4 %
7 tests
89 +5 % ▲
15 tests
durability (wear and abrasion)
76 +4 %
3 Tests
84 +10 % ▲
7 tests
Noise and comfort
80 ≈ average
6 tests
83 ≈ average ▲
13 tests
what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)
quietness (measured and subjective noise)
56 ≈ average
5 tests
94 ≈ average ▲
13 tests
ride comfort
66 Not measured. ▲
36 Not measured.
Technologies
3PMSF 3PMSF
✓ Only in some sizes
✓ Only in some sizes
M+S M+S
✓
✓
Rim protection Rim protection
✓ Only in some sizes
✓ Only in some sizes
Seal Seal
✓ Only in some sizes
✓ Only in some sizes
Reinforced profile Reinforced profile
✓ Only in some sizes
✓ Only in some sizes
OE OE
–
✓ Only in some sizes iba táto
Suitable for EVs Suitable for EVs
–
✓ Only in some sizes iba táto
Comparison

Technologies

Highlighted in green — this tyre has these in addition to the others; grey ones are shared by all.

3PMSF 3PMSF* M+S M+S Rim protection Rim protection* Seal (self-sealing technology) Seal* Reinforced profile Reinforced profile*
3PMSF 3PMSF* M+S M+S Rim protection Rim protection* Seal (self-sealing technology) Seal* Reinforced profile Reinforced profile* OE OE* Suitable for EVs Suitable for EVs*

* Only in some sizes

Comparison

Discipline comparison

A higher number and a longer line always mean a better tyre — also for noise (quieter), consumption (more efficient) and wear (lasts longer). compared with 169 winter tyres

8.4 Continental WinterContact TS 860
noise and comfort: only 65 % measured
9.6 Continental WINTERCONTACT TS 870
noise and comfort: only 65 % measured
Snow
75 +2 %
7 tests
84 +3 % ▲
18 tests
what it consists of Snow (3)
snow braking
78 +2 %
7 tests
86 +3 % ▲
16 tests
snow traction
44 −1 %
3 Tests
63 +2 % ▲
15 tests
snow handling
82 +1 %
5 tests
93 +3 % ▲
11 tests
Wet
94 +8 %
7 tests
97 +10 % ▲
17 tests
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking
88 +7 %
7 tests
97 +10 % ▲
15 tests
Aquaplaning
88 +10 %
7 tests
99 +10 % ▲
14 tests
wet handling
94 +4 %
5 tests
96 +4 % ▲
10 tests
Dry
66 ≈ average
6 tests
89 +2 % ▲
15 tests
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking
54 ≈ average
7 tests
84 +2 % ▲
15 tests
dry handling
77 ≈ average
4 Tests
94 ≈ average ▲
9 tests
Ice
34 −5 %
1 test 1 test
88 +5 % ▲
6 tests
what it consists of Ice (3)
ice braking
36 −4 %
2 Tests
90 +6 % ▲
6 tests
ice traction
11 −6 %
2 Tests
15 −21 % ▲
2 Tests weakness
ice handling
– ≈ average
1 test 1 test
6 −6 %
‹
2 Tests weakness
Economy
83 +4 %
6 tests
92 +8 % ▲
14 tests
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)
76 +4 %
7 tests
89 +5 % ▲
15 tests
durability (wear and abrasion)
76 +4 %
3 Tests
84 +10 % ▲
7 tests
Noise and comfort
80 ≈ average
6 tests
83 ≈ average ▲
13 tests
what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)
quietness (measured and subjective noise)
56 ≈ average
5 tests
94 ≈ average ▲
13 tests
ride comfort
66 Not measured. ▲
36 Not measured.