20 000+ reviews 4 600+ tyres 140+ tests 480 000+ prices tracked

Comparison Continental WINTERCONTACT TS 870 vs Continental WINTERCONTACT TS 870 P

9.6 Winter
WINTERCONTACT TS 870
Continental
215/60R16 95H CONTINENTAL WINTERCONTACT TS 870 ,3PMSF
Passenger car Standard-sport
Rolling resistance C Wet grip B Noise B
from 134 €
9.3 Winter
WINTERCONTACT TS 870 P
Continental
215/60R16 95H CONTINENTAL WINTERCONTACT TS 870 P ,(+) ,3PMSF
Passenger car Sport
Rolling resistance C Wet grip B Noise B
from 135 €
9.6 WINTERCONTACT TS 870 WINTERCONTACT TS 870 from 134 €
9.3 WINTERCONTACT TS 870 P WINTERCONTACT TS 870 P from 135 €
Overall rating
PTI – Pneutesty Index
9,6
9,3
Price from
134 € ▲ najlacnejšia
135 €
EU štítok
Rolling resistance C Wet grip B Noise B
Rolling resistance C Wet grip B Noise B
Discipline comparison
Snow
78 +2 % ▲
18 tests
63 +2 %
33 tests
what it consists of Snow (3)
snow braking
86 +3 % ▲
16 tests
71 +3 %
29 tests
snow traction
63 +2 % ▲
15 tests
57 +1 %
26 tests
snow handling
93 +3 % ▲
11 tests
86 +2 %
24 tests
Wet
96 +10 % ▲
17 tests
88 +8 %
33 tests
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking
97 +10 % ▲
15 tests
90 +8 %
28 tests
Aquaplaning
99 +10 % ▲
14 tests
81 +7 %
29 tests
wet handling
96 +4 % ▲
10 tests
86 +3 %
25 tests
Dry
87 +2 %
15 tests
95 +2 % ▲
27 tests
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking
84 +2 %
15 tests
89 +3 % ▲
27 tests
dry handling
94 ≈ average
9 tests
96 +1 % ▲
22 tests
Ice
– Not measured.
6 tests
– Not measured.
4 Tests
what it consists of Ice (3)
ice braking
90 +6 % ▲
6 tests
25 −4 %
4 Tests
ice traction
15 −21 % ▲
2 Tests
2 −10 %
1 test 1 test
ice handling
6 −6 %
‹
2 Tests
– Not measured.
Economy
89 +6 % ▲
14 tests
81 +5 %
30 tests
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)
89 +5 %
15 tests
97 +10 % ▲
28 tests
durability (wear and abrasion)
84 +10 % ▲
7 tests
44 ≈ average
8 tests
Noise and comfort
83 ≈ average
13 tests
95 ≈ average ▲
27 tests
what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)
quietness (measured and subjective noise)
94 ≈ average ▲
13 tests
38 ≈ average
23 tests
ride comfort
36 Not measured.
80 Not measured. ▲
Technologies
3PMSF 3PMSF
✓
✓
M+S M+S
✓
✓
OE OE
–
✓ iba táto
Suitable for EVs Suitable for EVs
–
✓ iba táto
Comparison

Technologies

Highlighted in green — this tyre has these in addition to the others; grey ones are shared by all.

3PMSF 3PMSF M+S M+S
3PMSF 3PMSF M+S M+S OE OE Suitable for EVs Suitable for EVs
Comparison

Discipline comparison

A higher number and a longer line always mean a better tyre — also for noise (quieter), consumption (more efficient) and wear (lasts longer). PTI compared with all winter tyres · rank in size 215/60 R16 among 47 available

9.6 Continental WINTERCONTACT TS 870
tested in R16
9.3 Continental WINTERCONTACT TS 870 P
tested in R16
Snow
78 +2 % ▲
18 tests
63 +2 %
33 tests
what it consists of Snow (3)
snow braking
86 +3 % ▲
16 tests
71 +3 %
29 tests
snow traction
63 +2 % ▲
15 tests
57 +1 %
26 tests
snow handling
93 +3 % ▲
11 tests
86 +2 %
24 tests
Wet
96 +10 % ▲
17 tests
88 +8 %
33 tests
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking
97 +10 % ▲
15 tests
90 +8 %
28 tests
Aquaplaning
99 +10 % ▲
14 tests
81 +7 %
29 tests
wet handling
96 +4 % ▲
10 tests
86 +3 %
25 tests
Dry
87 +2 %
15 tests
95 +2 % ▲
27 tests
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking
84 +2 %
15 tests
89 +3 % ▲
27 tests
dry handling
94 ≈ average
9 tests
96 +1 % ▲
22 tests
Ice
– Not measured.
6 tests
– Not measured.
4 Tests
what it consists of Ice (3)
ice braking
90 +6 % ▲
6 tests
25 −4 %
4 Tests
ice traction
15 −21 % ▲
2 Tests
2 −10 %
1 test 1 test
ice handling
6 −6 %
‹
2 Tests
– Not measured.
Economy
89 +6 % ▲
14 tests
81 +5 %
30 tests
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)
89 +5 %
15 tests
97 +10 % ▲
28 tests
durability (wear and abrasion)
84 +10 % ▲
7 tests
44 ≈ average
8 tests
Noise and comfort
83 ≈ average
13 tests
95 ≈ average ▲
27 tests
what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)
quietness (measured and subjective noise)
94 ≈ average ▲
13 tests
38 ≈ average
23 tests
ride comfort
36 Not measured.
80 Not measured. ▲