Comparison Firestone ROADHAWK vs Firestone ROADHAWK 2
7.1
ROADHAWK
ROADHAWK 7.8
ROADHAWK 2
ROADHAWK 2 Overall rating
PTI – Pneutesty Index
7,1
7,8
Discipline comparison
61 +1 %
82 +5 % ▲
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking
46 ≈ average
69 +4 % ▲
Aquaplaning
92 +3 %
94 +6 % ▲
wet handling
80 +1 %
84 +3 % ▲
67 +2 % ▲
66 +2 %
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking
65 +1 %
68 +2 % ▲
dry handling
75 ≈ average ▲
47 ≈ average
58 ≈ average ▲
56 −2 %
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)
65 +5 %
75 +4 % ▲
durability (wear and abrasion)
49 −4 % ▲
27 −7 %
7 −2 %
42 −2 % ▲
what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)
quietness (measured and subjective noise)
0 −2 %
19 −2 % ▲
ride comfort
26 Not measured. ▲
16 Not measured.
Technologies
✓ Only in some sizes
–
✓ Only in some sizes
–
Comparison
Technologies
Highlighted in green — this tyre has these in addition to the others; grey ones are shared by all.
none
* Only in some sizes
Comparison
Discipline comparison
A higher number and a longer line always mean a better tyre — also for noise (quieter), consumption (more efficient) and wear (lasts longer). compared with 257 summer tyres
7.1 Firestone ROADHAWK
noise and comfort: only 65 % measured
7.8 Firestone ROADHAWK 2
61 +1 %
82 +5 % ▲
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking 14 tests 11 tests
46 ≈ average
69 +4 % ▲
Aquaplaning 9 tests 10 tests
92 +3 %
94 +6 % ▲
wet handling 9 tests 8 tests
80 +1 %
84 +3 % ▲
67 +2 % ▲
66 +2 %
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking 13 tests 11 tests
65 +1 %
68 +2 % ▲
dry handling 9 tests 7 tests
75 ≈ average ▲
47 ≈ average
58 ≈ average ▲
56 −2 %
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption) 9 tests 9 tests
65 +5 %
75 +4 % ▲
durability (wear and abrasion) 6 tests 3 Tests weakness
49 −4 % ▲
27 −7 %
7 −2 %
42 −2 % ▲
what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)
quietness (measured and subjective noise) 10 tests 8 tests
0 −2 %
19 −2 % ▲
ride comfort
26 Not measured. ▲
16 Not measured.