20 000+ reviews 4 600+ tyres 140+ tests 470 000+ prices tracked

Comparison Firestone ROADHAWK vs Firestone ROADHAWK 2

Overall rating
PTI – Pneutesty Index
7,1
7,8
Discipline comparison
Wet
61 +1 %
18 tests
82 +5 % ▲
11 tests
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking
46 ≈ average
14 tests
69 +4 % ▲
11 tests
Aquaplaning
92 +3 %
9 tests
94 +6 % ▲
10 tests
wet handling
80 +1 %
9 tests
84 +3 % ▲
8 tests
Dry
67 +2 % ▲
17 tests
66 +2 %
11 tests
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking
65 +1 %
13 tests
68 +2 % ▲
11 tests
dry handling
75 ≈ average ▲
9 tests
47 ≈ average
7 tests
Economy
58 ≈ average ▲
9 tests
56 −2 %
9 tests
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)
65 +5 %
9 tests
75 +4 % ▲
9 tests
durability (wear and abrasion)
49 −4 % ▲
6 tests
27 −7 %
3 Tests weakness
Noise and comfort
7 −2 %
10 tests
42 −2 % ▲
9 tests
what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)
quietness (measured and subjective noise)
0 −2 %
10 tests
19 −2 % ▲
8 tests
ride comfort
26 Not measured. ▲
16 Not measured.
Technologies
Rim protection Rim protection
✓ Only in some sizes
–
Reinforced profile Reinforced profile
✓ Only in some sizes
–
Comparison

Technologies

Highlighted in green — this tyre has these in addition to the others; grey ones are shared by all.

Rim protection Rim protection* Reinforced profile Reinforced profile*
none

* Only in some sizes

Comparison

Discipline comparison

A higher number and a longer line always mean a better tyre — also for noise (quieter), consumption (more efficient) and wear (lasts longer). compared with 257 summer tyres

7.1 Firestone ROADHAWK
noise and comfort: only 65 % measured
7.8 Firestone ROADHAWK 2
Wet
61 +1 %
18 tests
82 +5 % ▲
11 tests
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking
46 ≈ average
14 tests
69 +4 % ▲
11 tests
Aquaplaning
92 +3 %
9 tests
94 +6 % ▲
10 tests
wet handling
80 +1 %
9 tests
84 +3 % ▲
8 tests
Dry
67 +2 % ▲
17 tests
66 +2 %
11 tests
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking
65 +1 %
13 tests
68 +2 % ▲
11 tests
dry handling
75 ≈ average ▲
9 tests
47 ≈ average
7 tests
Economy
58 ≈ average ▲
9 tests
56 −2 %
9 tests
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)
65 +5 %
9 tests
75 +4 % ▲
9 tests
durability (wear and abrasion)
49 −4 % ▲
6 tests
27 −7 %
3 Tests weakness
Noise and comfort
7 −2 %
10 tests
42 −2 % ▲
9 tests
what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)
quietness (measured and subjective noise)
0 −2 %
10 tests
19 −2 % ▲
8 tests
ride comfort
26 Not measured. ▲
16 Not measured.