Comparison Goodyear EAGLE F1 ASYMMETRIC 5 vs Goodyear EAGLE F1 ASYMMETRIC 6
Overall rating
PTI – Pneutesty Index
9,2
9,6
Discipline comparison
Wet 97 +8 % ▲
96 +8 %
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking
96 +11 % ▲
94 +10 %
Aquaplaning
90 +4 % ▲
80 +2 %
wet handling
91 +3 %
95 +4 % ▲
Dry 87 +3 %
96 +5 % ▲
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking
87 +4 %
96 +6 % ▲
dry handling
81 ≈ average
98 +2 % ▲
Economy 66 ≈ average
79 +10 % ▲
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)
35 −5 %
46 −3 % ▲
durability (wear and abrasion)
90 +21 %
95 +30 % ▲
Noise and comfort 96 ≈ average ▲
89 +2 %
what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)
quietness (measured and subjective noise)
88 ≈ average ▲
37 +2 %
ride comfort
72 Not measured. ▲
64 Not measured.
Technologies
OE ✓ Only in some sizes
✓ Only in some sizes
Rim protection ✓ Only in some sizes
✓ Only in some sizes
ROF ✓ Only in some sizes
✓ Only in some sizes
Seal ✓ Only in some sizes
✓ Only in some sizes
Sound ✓ Only in some sizes
✓ Only in some sizes
Suitable for EVs ✓ Only in some sizes
✓ Only in some sizes
Reinforced profile ✓ Only in some sizes
✓ Only in some sizes
Comparison
Technologies
Highlighted in green — this tyre has these in addition to the others; grey ones are shared by all.
OE* Rim protection* ROF* Seal* Sound* Suitable for EVs* Reinforced profile* OE* Rim protection* ROF* Seal* Sound* Suitable for EVs* Reinforced profile* * Only in some sizes
Comparison
Discipline comparison
A higher number and a longer line always mean a better tyre — also for noise (quieter), consumption (more efficient) and wear (lasts longer). compared with 257 summer tyres
9.2 Goodyear EAGLE F1 ASYMMETRIC 5
9.6 Goodyear EAGLE F1 ASYMMETRIC 6
Wet 97 +8 % ▲
96 +8 %
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking 18 tests 28 tests
96 +11 % ▲
94 +10 %
Aquaplaning 18 tests 28 tests
90 +4 % ▲
80 +2 %
wet handling 17 tests 27 tests
91 +3 %
95 +4 % ▲
Dry 87 +3 %
96 +5 % ▲
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking 18 tests 29 tests
87 +4 %
96 +6 % ▲
dry handling 16 tests 24 tests
81 ≈ average
98 +2 % ▲
Economy 66 ≈ average
79 +10 % ▲
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption) 15 tests weakness 26 tests
35 −5 %
46 −3 % ▲
durability (wear and abrasion) 4 Tests 8 tests
90 +21 %
95 +30 % ▲
Noise and comfort 96 ≈ average ▲
89 +2 %
what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)
quietness (measured and subjective noise) 13 tests 24 tests
88 ≈ average ▲
37 +2 %
ride comfort
72 Not measured. ▲
64 Not measured.