Comparison Goodyear ULTRAGRIP PERFORMANCE GEN-1 vs Goodyear ULTRAGRIP PERFORMANCE 3
Overall rating
PTI – Pneutesty Index
7,5
9,6
Price from
277 € ▲ najlacnejšia
280 €
EU štítok
D 
B 
B C C B Discipline comparison
Snow 42 ≈ average
86 +3 % ▲
what it consists of Snow (3)
snow braking
63 ≈ average
89 +4 % ▲
snow traction
– Not measured.
92 +4 %
snow handling
68 ≈ average
94 +3 % ▲
Wet 61 +4 %
87 +5 % ▲
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking
85 +7 %
91 +9 % ▲
Aquaplaning
73 +6 %
89 +6 % ▲
wet handling
84 +3 %
96 +4 % ▲
Dry 14 ≈ average
81 +1 % ▲
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking
53 ≈ average
91 +3 % ▲
dry handling
18 ≈ average
‹
4 Tests 81 ≈ average ▲
Ice – Not measured.
– Not measured.
what it consists of Ice (2)
ice braking
– Not measured.
27 −3 %
ice traction
– Not measured.
20 −7 %
Economy 44 −3 %
91 +10 % ▲
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)
62 +2 % ▲
47 +3 %
durability (wear and abrasion)
24 −13 %
94 +22 % ▲
Noise and comfort 15 ≈ average
97 +1 % ▲
what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)
quietness (measured and subjective noise)
43 ≈ average
96 +1 % ▲
ride comfort
– Not measured.
64 Not measured.
Technologies
3PMSF ✓
✓
M+S ✓
✓
Rim protection ✓
✓
Suitable for EVs ✓
✓
Reinforced profile ✓
✓
3D sipes ✓ iba táto
–
OE ✓ iba táto
–
Comparison
Technologies
Highlighted in green — this tyre has these in addition to the others; grey ones are shared by all.
3PMSF M+S Rim protection Suitable for EVs Reinforced profile 3D sipes OE 3PMSF M+S Rim protection Suitable for EVs Reinforced profile Comparison
Discipline comparison
A higher number and a longer line always mean a better tyre — also for noise (quieter), consumption (more efficient) and wear (lasts longer). PTI compared with all winter tyres · rank in size 265/40 R20 among 14 available
7.5 Goodyear ULTRAGRIP PERFORMANCE GEN-1 
tested only in R17, R18
tested only in R17, R18 9.6 Goodyear ULTRAGRIP PERFORMANCE 3 tested in R20
tested in R20 Snow 42 ≈ average
86 +3 % ▲
what it consists of Snow (3)
snow braking 4 Tests 32 tests
63 ≈ average
89 +4 % ▲
snow traction 29 tests
– Not measured.
92 +4 %
snow handling 4 Tests 24 tests
68 ≈ average
94 +3 % ▲
Wet 61 +4 %
87 +5 % ▲
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking 4 Tests 30 tests
85 +7 %
91 +9 % ▲
Aquaplaning 3 Tests 31 tests
73 +6 %
89 +6 % ▲
wet handling 4 Tests 24 tests
84 +3 %
96 +4 % ▲
Dry 14 ≈ average
81 +1 % ▲
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking 4 Tests 30 tests
53 ≈ average
91 +3 % ▲
dry handling 19 tests
18 ≈ average
‹
4 Tests 81 ≈ average ▲
Ice – Not measured.
– Not measured.
what it consists of Ice (2)
ice braking 6 tests
– Not measured.
27 −3 %
ice traction 1 test 1 test
– Not measured.
20 −7 %
Economy 44 −3 %
91 +10 % ▲
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption) 3 Tests 30 tests
62 +2 % ▲
47 +3 %
durability (wear and abrasion) 1 test 1 test 10 tests
24 −13 %
94 +22 % ▲
Noise and comfort 15 ≈ average
97 +1 % ▲
what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)
quietness (measured and subjective noise) 3 Tests 23 tests
43 ≈ average
96 +1 % ▲
ride comfort
– Not measured.
64 Not measured.