20 000+ reviews 4 600+ tyres 140+ tests 470 000+ prices tracked

Comparison Hankook K137A VENTUS EVO SUV vs Goodride SOLMAX 1 XL BSW

Overall rating
PTI – Pneutesty Index
9,9
5,5
Discipline comparison
Wet
99 +9 % ▲
11 tests
51 +1 %
3 Tests
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking
99 +13 % ▲
8 tests
37 ≈ average
3 Tests
Aquaplaning
69 +3 % ▲
6 tests
59 ≈ average
3 Tests
wet handling
99 +4 % ▲
5 tests
19 −1 %
2 Tests
Dry
98 +5 % ▲
11 tests
19 ≈ average
3 Tests
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking
97 +6 % ▲
8 tests
24 −1 %
3 Tests
dry handling
99 +2 % ▲
9 tests
0 −2 %
2 Tests
Economy
65 +2 % ▲
5 tests
12 −11 %
3 Tests
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)
44 −5 % ▲
5 tests
25 −3 %
3 Tests
durability (wear and abrasion)
83 +12 % ▲
2 Tests
13 −15 %
2 Tests
Noise and comfort
98 ≈ average ▲
8 tests
10 +1 %
3 Tests
what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)
quietness (measured and subjective noise)
91 ≈ average ▲
7 tests
87 +1 %
3 Tests
ride comfort
83 Not measured. ▲
1 Not measured.
Technologies
OE OE
✓ Only in some sizes iba táto
–
Rim protection Rim protection
✓ Only in some sizes iba táto
–
ROF ROF
✓ Only in some sizes iba táto
–
Sound Sound
✓ Only in some sizes iba táto
–
Reinforced profile Reinforced profile
✓ Only in some sizes iba táto
–
Comparison

Technologies

Highlighted in green — this tyre has these in addition to the others; grey ones are shared by all.

OE OE* Rim protection Rim protection* ROF (run-flat technology) ROF* Sound (noise reduction) Sound* Reinforced profile Reinforced profile*
none

* Only in some sizes

Comparison

Discipline comparison

A higher number and a longer line always mean a better tyre — also for noise (quieter), consumption (more efficient) and wear (lasts longer). compared with 257 summer tyres

9.9 Hankook K137A VENTUS EVO SUV
5.5 Goodride SOLMAX 1 XL BSW
noise and comfort: only 65 % measured
Wet
99 +9 % ▲
11 tests
51 +1 %
3 Tests
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking
99 +13 % ▲
8 tests
37 ≈ average
3 Tests
Aquaplaning
69 +3 % ▲
6 tests
59 ≈ average
3 Tests
wet handling
99 +4 % ▲
5 tests
19 −1 %
2 Tests
Dry
98 +5 % ▲
11 tests
19 ≈ average
3 Tests
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking
97 +6 % ▲
8 tests
24 −1 %
3 Tests
dry handling
99 +2 % ▲
9 tests
0 −2 %
2 Tests
Economy
65 +2 % ▲
5 tests
12 −11 %
3 Tests
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)
44 −5 % ▲
5 tests
25 −3 %
3 Tests
durability (wear and abrasion)
83 +12 % ▲
2 Tests
13 −15 %
2 Tests
Noise and comfort
98 ≈ average ▲
8 tests
10 +1 %
3 Tests
what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)
quietness (measured and subjective noise)
91 ≈ average ▲
7 tests
87 +1 %
3 Tests
ride comfort
83 Not measured. ▲
1 Not measured.