20 000+ reviews 4 600+ tyres 140+ tests 480 000+ prices tracked

Comparison Hankook K137 VENTUS EVO vs Goodride SOLMAX 1

9.9 K137A VENTUS EVO SUV K137A VENTUS EVO SUV from 154 €
5.5 SOLMAX 1 XL BSW SOLMAX 1 XL BSW from 157 €
Overall rating
PTI – Pneutesty Index
9,9
5,5
Price from
154 € ▲ najlacnejšia
157 €
EU štítok
Rolling resistance C Wet grip A Noise B
Rolling resistance C Wet grip A Noise B
Discipline comparison
Wet
99 +7 % ▲
11 tests
29 −2 %
3 Tests
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking
99 +13 % ▲
8 tests
37 ≈ average
3 Tests
Aquaplaning
69 +3 % ▲
6 tests
59 ≈ average
3 Tests
wet handling
99 +4 % ▲
5 tests
19 −1 %
2 Tests
Dry
94 +3 % ▲
11 tests
15 −3 %
3 Tests
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking
97 +6 % ▲
8 tests
24 −1 %
3 Tests
dry handling
99 +2 % ▲
9 tests
0 −2 %
‹
2 Tests
Economy
67 +3 % ▲
5 tests
13 −10 %
3 Tests
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)
44 −5 % ▲
5 tests
25 −3 %
3 Tests
durability (wear and abrasion)
83 +12 % ▲
2 Tests
13 −15 %
2 Tests
Noise and comfort
99 ≈ average ▲
8 tests
15 +1 %
3 Tests
what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)
quietness (measured and subjective noise)
91 ≈ average ▲
7 tests
87 +1 %
3 Tests
ride comfort
83 Not measured. ▲
1 Not measured.
‹
Technologies
Rim protection Rim protection
✓ iba táto
–
Reinforced profile Reinforced profile
✓ iba táto
–
Comparison

Technologies

Highlighted in green — this tyre has these in addition to the others; grey ones are shared by all.

Rim protection Rim protection Reinforced profile Reinforced profile
none
Comparison

Discipline comparison

A higher number and a longer line always mean a better tyre — also for noise (quieter), consumption (more efficient) and wear (lasts longer). PTI compared with all summer tyres · rank in size 275/35 R19 among 47 available

9.9 Hankook K137A VENTUS EVO SUV
tested in this size
5.5 Goodride SOLMAX 1 XL BSW
tested only in R17, R18
Wet
99 +7 % ▲
11 tests
29 −2 %
3 Tests
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking
99 +13 % ▲
8 tests
37 ≈ average
3 Tests
Aquaplaning
69 +3 % ▲
6 tests
59 ≈ average
3 Tests
wet handling
99 +4 % ▲
5 tests
19 −1 %
2 Tests
Dry
94 +3 % ▲
11 tests
15 −3 %
3 Tests
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking
97 +6 % ▲
8 tests
24 −1 %
3 Tests
dry handling
99 +2 % ▲
9 tests
0 −2 %
‹
2 Tests
Economy
67 +3 % ▲
5 tests
13 −10 %
3 Tests
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)
44 −5 % ▲
5 tests
25 −3 %
3 Tests
durability (wear and abrasion)
83 +12 % ▲
2 Tests
13 −15 %
2 Tests
Noise and comfort
99 ≈ average ▲
8 tests
15 +1 %
3 Tests
what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)
quietness (measured and subjective noise)
91 ≈ average ▲
7 tests
87 +1 %
3 Tests
ride comfort
83 Not measured. ▲
1 Not measured.
‹