Comparison Hankook K137 VENTUS EVO vs Michelin PILOT SPORT 4
Overall rating
PTI – Pneutesty Index
9,9
9,4
Price from
134 € ▲ najlacnejšia
177 €
EU štítok
Discipline comparison
99 +7 % ▲
98 +7 %
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking
99 +13 % ▲
98 +12 %
Aquaplaning
69 +3 %
98 +4 % ▲
wet handling
99 +4 % ▲
90 +3 %
94 +4 % ▲
84 +3 %
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking
97 +6 % ▲
94 +6 %
dry handling
99 +2 % ▲
89 +1 %
74 +5 %
76 +4 % ▲
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)
44 −5 %
47 −2 % ▲
durability (wear and abrasion)
83 +12 % ▲
80 +12 %
99 ≈ average ▲
84 ≈ average
what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)
quietness (measured and subjective noise)
91 ≈ average ▲
56 ≈ average
ride comfort
83 Not measured.
84 Not measured. ▲
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
–
✓ iba táto
–
✓ iba táto
Comparison
Technologies
Highlighted in green — this tyre has these in addition to the others; grey ones are shared by all.
Comparison
Discipline comparison
A higher number and a longer line always mean a better tyre — also for noise (quieter), consumption (more efficient) and wear (lasts longer). PTI compared with all summer tyres · rank in size 255/35 R18 among 50 available
9.9 Hankook K137A VENTUS EVO SUV
tested in R18
9.4 Michelin PILOT SPORT 4
tested in R18
99 +7 % ▲
98 +7 %
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking 8 tests 21 tests
99 +13 % ▲
98 +12 %
Aquaplaning 6 tests 17 tests
69 +3 %
98 +4 % ▲
wet handling 5 tests 21 tests
99 +4 % ▲
90 +3 %
94 +4 % ▲
84 +3 %
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking 8 tests 22 tests
97 +6 % ▲
94 +6 %
dry handling 9 tests 20 tests
99 +2 % ▲
89 +1 %
74 +5 %
76 +4 % ▲
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption) 5 tests 17 tests
44 −5 %
47 −2 % ▲
durability (wear and abrasion) 2 Tests 3 Tests
83 +12 % ▲
80 +12 %
99 ≈ average ▲
84 ≈ average
what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)
quietness (measured and subjective noise) 7 tests 16 tests
91 ≈ average ▲
56 ≈ average
ride comfort
83 Not measured.
84 Not measured. ▲