Comparison Hankook W330A WINTER I*CEPT EVO3 X vs Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5
Overall rating
PTI – Pneutesty Index
8,7
10,0
Discipline comparison
Snow 80 +3 %
98 +5 % ▲
what it consists of Snow (3)
snow braking
83 +3 %
100 +6 % ▲
snow traction
74 +2 %
95 +5 % ▲
snow handling
81 +2 %
96 +4 % ▲
Wet 88 +8 %
93 +7 % ▲
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking
88 +8 %
94 +9 % ▲
Aquaplaning
94 +9 % ▲
76 +5 %
wet handling
78 +2 %
86 +2 % ▲
Dry 78 +1 %
99 +4 % ▲
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking
78 +2 %
98 +5 % ▲
dry handling
68 ≈ average
98 +2 % ▲
Ice 21 +2 %
77 +6 % ▲
what it consists of Ice (2)
ice braking
20 +1 %
79 +5 % ▲
ice traction
50 +4 %
91 +7 % ▲
Economy 68 +6 %
89 +11 % ▲
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)
39 ≈ average
65 +2 % ▲
durability (wear and abrasion)
81 +12 %
91 +21 % ▲
Noise and comfort 50 −1 %
87 +2 % ▲
what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)
quietness (measured and subjective noise)
3 −1 %
98 +2 % ▲
ride comfort
40 Not measured.
63 Not measured. ▲
Technologies
3PMSF ✓ Only in some sizes
✓ Only in some sizes
M+S ✓
✓
OE ✓ Only in some sizes
✓ Only in some sizes
Rim protection ✓ Only in some sizes
✓ Only in some sizes
ROF ✓ Only in some sizes
✓ Only in some sizes
Sound ✓ Only in some sizes
✓ Only in some sizes
Reinforced profile ✓ Only in some sizes
✓ Only in some sizes
Suitable for EVs –
✓ Only in some sizes iba táto
Comparison
Technologies
Highlighted in green — this tyre has these in addition to the others; grey ones are shared by all.
3PMSF* M+S OE* Rim protection* ROF* Sound* Reinforced profile* 3PMSF* M+S OE* Rim protection* ROF* Sound* Reinforced profile* Suitable for EVs* * Only in some sizes
Comparison
Discipline comparison
A higher number and a longer line always mean a better tyre — also for noise (quieter), consumption (more efficient) and wear (lasts longer). compared with 169 winter tyres
8.7 Hankook W330A WINTER I*CEPT EVO3 X 
noise and comfort: only 65 % measured
noise and comfort: only 65 % measured 10 Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 noise and comfort: only 65 % measured
noise and comfort: only 65 % measured Snow 80 +3 %
98 +5 % ▲
what it consists of Snow (3)
snow braking 19 tests 17 tests
83 +3 %
100 +6 % ▲
snow traction 17 tests 16 tests
74 +2 %
95 +5 % ▲
snow handling 16 tests 20 tests
81 +2 %
96 +4 % ▲
Wet 88 +8 %
93 +7 % ▲
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking 18 tests 17 tests
88 +8 %
94 +9 % ▲
Aquaplaning 17 tests 17 tests
94 +9 % ▲
76 +5 %
wet handling 17 tests 20 tests
78 +2 %
86 +2 % ▲
Dry 78 +1 %
99 +4 % ▲
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking 17 tests 16 tests
78 +2 %
98 +5 % ▲
dry handling 16 tests 13 tests
68 ≈ average
98 +2 % ▲
Ice 21 +2 %
77 +6 % ▲
what it consists of Ice (2)
ice braking 2 Tests 2 Tests
20 +1 %
79 +5 % ▲
ice traction 1 test 1 test 1 test 1 test
50 +4 %
91 +7 % ▲
Economy 68 +6 %
89 +11 % ▲
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption) 17 tests 17 tests
39 ≈ average
65 +2 % ▲
durability (wear and abrasion) 5 tests 5 tests
81 +12 %
91 +21 % ▲
Noise and comfort 50 −1 %
87 +2 % ▲
what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)
quietness (measured and subjective noise) 16 tests 13 tests
3 −1 %
98 +2 % ▲
ride comfort
40 Not measured.
63 Not measured. ▲