Comparison Kleber Dynaxer Hp2 vs Kleber DYNAXER HP4
Overall rating
PTI – Pneutesty Index
–
7,0
Price from
–
79 € ▲ cheapest
EU label
F 
E C B 
A Discipline comparison
Wet–
65 +4 %
8 tests what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking
–
65 +3 %
5 tests Aquaplaning
–
65 ≈ average
4 Tests wet handling
–
4 ≈ average
3 Tests 
Dry–
63 +3 %
7 tests what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking
–
63 +1 %
4 Tests dry handling
–
9 ≈ average
3 Tests 
Economy–
73 ≈ average
4 Tests what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)
–
85 +4 %
4 Tests durability (wear and abrasion)
–
72 +3 %
4 Tests 
Noise and comfort–
61 +2 %
4 Tests noise only what it consists of Noise and comfort (1)
quietness (measured and subjective noise)
–
98 +1 %
4 Tests Comparison
Discipline comparison
A higher number and a longer line always mean a better tyre — also for noise (quieter), consumption (more efficient) and wear (lasts longer). PTI compared with all summer tyres · rank in size 205/65 R15 among 26 available
For example, wet braking, aquaplaning, and handling — showing what makes up the category score.
Wet
Kleber Dynaxer Hp2
– Not measured.
Kleber DYNAXER HP4
beats 27 of 42
65 +3,9 %
Subcategories wet
wet braking
Kleber Dynaxer Hp2
– Not measured.
Kleber DYNAXER HP4
beats 29 of 42
65 +2,5 %
Aquaplaning
Kleber Dynaxer Hp2
– Not measured.
Kleber DYNAXER HP4
beats 19 of 32
65 ≈ average
wet handling
Kleber Dynaxer Hp2
– Not measured.
Kleber DYNAXER HP4
beats 1 of 28
4 ≈ average
A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.
Dry
Kleber Dynaxer Hp2
– Not measured.
Kleber DYNAXER HP4
beats 26 of 42
63 +2,6 %
Subcategories dry
dry braking
Kleber Dynaxer Hp2
– Not measured.
Kleber DYNAXER HP4
beats 30 of 42
63 +1,4 %
dry handling
Kleber Dynaxer Hp2
– Not measured.
Kleber DYNAXER HP4
beats 0 of 28
9 ≈ average
A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.
Economy
Kleber Dynaxer Hp2
– Not measured.
Kleber DYNAXER HP4
beats 22 of 31
73 ≈ average
Subcategories economy
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)
Kleber Dynaxer Hp2
– Not measured.
Kleber DYNAXER HP4
beats 23 of 31
85 +4,0 %
durability (wear and abrasion)
Kleber Dynaxer Hp2
– Not measured.
Kleber DYNAXER HP4
beats 18 of 25
72 +2,7 %
A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.
Noise and comfort
Kleber Dynaxer Hp2
– Not measured.
Kleber DYNAXER HP4
beats 19 of 32
61 +1,7 %
Subcategories noise and comfort
quietness (measured and subjective noise)
Kleber Dynaxer Hp2
– Not measured.
Kleber DYNAXER HP4
beats 31 of 32
98 +1,4 %
A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.