4 600+ tyres 100+ tests 460 000+ prices tracked

Comparison Kleber Dynaxer Hp3 vs Kleber DYNAXER HP4

7.0 DYNAXER HP4 DYNAXER HP4 from 53 €
Overall rating
PTI – Pneutesty Index
5,4
7,0
Price from
–
53 € ▲ cheapest
EU label
Rolling resistance E Wet grip C
Rolling resistance C Wet grip B Noise A
Discipline comparison
Wet
24 −2 %
2 Tests
65 +4 %
8 tests
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking
36 −2 %
2 Tests
65 +3 %
5 tests
Aquaplaning
30 ≈ average
2 Tests
65 ≈ average
4 Tests
wet handling
5 −4 %
2 Tests
4 ≈ average
3 Tests
Dry
22 −3 %
2 Tests
63 +2 %
7 tests
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking
18 −5 %
2 Tests
63 +1 %
4 Tests
dry handling
25 −2 %
1 Test 1 test
9 ≈ average
3 Tests
Economy
74 +8 %
3 Tests
69 ≈ average
4 Tests
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)
59 +5 %
2 Tests
85 +4 %
4 Tests
durability (wear and abrasion)
68 +5 %
2 Tests
72 +3 %
4 Tests
Noise and comfort
19 ≈ average
2 Tests noise only
59 +1 %
4 Tests noise only
what it consists of Noise and comfort (1)
quietness (measured and subjective noise)
32 ≈ average
2 Tests
98 +1 %
4 Tests
Comparison

Discipline comparison

A higher number and a longer line always mean a better tyre — also for noise (quieter), consumption (more efficient) and wear (lasts longer). PTI compared with all summer tyres · rank in size 195/65 R15 among 46 available

For example, wet braking, aquaplaning, and handling — showing what makes up the category score.

Wet

Kleber Dynaxer Hp3 from 6 measurements · 2 tests
24 −1,5 %
Kleber DYNAXER HP4 from 18 measurements · 8 tests
beats 41 of 64
65 +3,5 %
Subcategories wet

wet braking

Kleber Dynaxer Hp3 2 tests
36 −2,0 %
Kleber DYNAXER HP4 5 tests
beats 42 of 64
65 +2,5 %

Aquaplaning

Kleber Dynaxer Hp3 2 tests
30 ≈ average
Kleber DYNAXER HP4 4 tests
beats 33 of 53
65 ≈ average

wet handling

Kleber Dynaxer Hp3 2 tests
5 −3,6 %
Kleber DYNAXER HP4 3 tests
beats 2 of 46
4 ≈ average

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.

Dry

Kleber Dynaxer Hp3 from 3 measurements · 2 tests
22 −3,4 %
Kleber DYNAXER HP4 from 7 measurements · 7 tests
beats 40 of 64
63 +2,0 %
Subcategories dry

dry braking

Kleber Dynaxer Hp3 2 tests
18 −4,5 %
Kleber DYNAXER HP4 4 tests
beats 44 of 64
63 +1,4 %

dry handling

Kleber Dynaxer Hp3 1 test
25 −2,1 %
Kleber DYNAXER HP4 3 tests
beats 4 of 46
9 ≈ average

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.

Economy

Kleber Dynaxer Hp3 from 4 measurements · 3 tests
74 +7,9 %
Kleber DYNAXER HP4 from 9 measurements · 4 tests
beats 36 of 53
69 ≈ average
Subcategories economy

efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)

Kleber Dynaxer Hp3 2 tests
59 +4,9 %
Kleber DYNAXER HP4 4 tests
beats 41 of 53
85 +4,0 %

durability (wear and abrasion)

Kleber Dynaxer Hp3 2 tests
68 +5,2 %
Kleber DYNAXER HP4 4 tests
beats 28 of 40
72 +2,7 %

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.

Noise and comfort

Kleber Dynaxer Hp3 from 2 measurements · 2 tests noise only
19 ≈ average
Kleber DYNAXER HP4 from 4 measurements · 4 tests noise only
beats 30 of 52
59 +1,4 %
Subcategories noise and comfort

quietness (measured and subjective noise)

Kleber Dynaxer Hp3 2 tests
32 ≈ average
Kleber DYNAXER HP4 4 tests
beats 50 of 52
98 +1,4 %

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.