20 000+ reviews 4 600+ tyres 140+ tests 470 000+ prices tracked

Comparison Kleber DYNAXER HP5 SUV vs Goodride SOLMAX 1 XL BSW

5.4 Summer
DYNAXER HP5 SUV
Kleber
DYNAXER HP5 SUV
SUV / 4×4* Standard
5.5 Summer
SOLMAX 1
Goodride
SOLMAX 1
SUV / 4×4 Standard
5.4 DYNAXER HP5 SUV DYNAXER HP5 SUV
5.5 SOLMAX 1 SOLMAX 1
Overall rating
PTI – Pneutesty Index
5,4
5,5
Discipline comparison
Wet
39 +2 %
2 Tests
51 +1 % ▲
3 Tests
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking
57 +2 % ▲
1 test 1 test
37 ≈ average
3 Tests
Aquaplaning
3 −3 %
1 test 1 test
59 ≈ average ▲
3 Tests
wet handling
2 −1 %
1 test 1 test
19 −1 % ▲
2 Tests
Dry
71 +3 % ▲
2 Tests
19 ≈ average
3 Tests
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking
77 +4 % ▲
1 test 1 test
24 −1 %
3 Tests
dry handling
17 ≈ average ▲
1 test 1 test
0 −2 %
2 Tests
Economy
97 from 1 measurement ▲
1 test 1 test bez opotrebenia
12 −11 %
3 Tests
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)
96 +18 % ▲
1 test 1 test
25 −3 %
3 Tests
durability (wear and abrasion)
– Not measured.
13 −15 %
2 Tests
Noise and comfort
44 from 1 measurement ▲
1 test 1 test noise only
10 +1 %
3 Tests
what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)
quietness (measured and subjective noise)
74 ≈ average
1 test 1 test
87 +1 % ▲
3 Tests
ride comfort
– Not measured.
1 Not measured.
Technologies
3PMSF 3PMSF
✓ Only in some sizes
–
Reinforced profile Reinforced profile
✓ Only in some sizes iba táto
–
Comparison

Technologies

Highlighted in green — this tyre has these in addition to the others; grey ones are shared by all.

3PMSF 3PMSF* Reinforced profile Reinforced profile*
none

* Only in some sizes

Comparison

Discipline comparison

A higher number and a longer line always mean a better tyre — also for noise (quieter), consumption (more efficient) and wear (lasts longer). compared with 257 summer tyres

5.4 Kleber DYNAXER HP5 SUV
provisional PTI
5.5 Goodride SOLMAX 1 XL BSW
noise and comfort: only 65 % measured
Wet
39 +2 %
2 Tests
51 +1 % ▲
3 Tests
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking
57 +2 % ▲
1 test 1 test
37 ≈ average
3 Tests
Aquaplaning
3 −3 %
1 test 1 test
59 ≈ average ▲
3 Tests
wet handling
2 −1 %
1 test 1 test
19 −1 % ▲
2 Tests
Dry
71 +3 % ▲
2 Tests
19 ≈ average
3 Tests
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking
77 +4 % ▲
1 test 1 test
24 −1 %
3 Tests
dry handling
17 ≈ average ▲
1 test 1 test
0 −2 %
2 Tests
Economy
97 from 1 measurement ▲
1 test 1 test bez opotrebenia
12 −11 %
3 Tests
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)
96 +18 % ▲
1 test 1 test
25 −3 %
3 Tests
durability (wear and abrasion)
– Not measured.
13 −15 %
2 Tests
Noise and comfort
44 from 1 measurement ▲
1 test 1 test noise only
10 +1 %
3 Tests
what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)
quietness (measured and subjective noise)
74 ≈ average
1 test 1 test
87 +1 % ▲
3 Tests
ride comfort
– Not measured.
1 Not measured.