20 000+ reviews 4 600+ tyres 140+ tests 480 000+ prices tracked

Comparison Kleber DYNAXER HP5 vs Goodride SOLMAX 1

5.4 Summer
DYNAXER HP5 SUV
Kleber
255/40R19 96V KLEBER DYNAXER HP5
SUV / 4×4 Standard
Rolling resistance B Wet grip A Noise B
from 128 €
5.5 Summer
SOLMAX 1 XL BSW
Goodride
255/40R19 100Y Goodride SOLMAX 1
Passenger car Standard
Rolling resistance C Wet grip A Noise B
from 131 €
5.4 DYNAXER HP5 SUV DYNAXER HP5 SUV from 128 €
5.5 SOLMAX 1 XL BSW SOLMAX 1 XL BSW from 131 €
Overall rating
PTI – Pneutesty Index
5,4
5,5
Price from
128 € ▲ najlacnejšia
131 €
EU štítok
Rolling resistance B Wet grip A Noise B
Rolling resistance C Wet grip A Noise B
Discipline comparison
Wet
29 ≈ average
2 Tests
38 ≈ average ▲
3 Tests
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking
57 +2 % ▲
1 test 1 test
37 ≈ average
3 Tests
Aquaplaning
3 −3 %
1 test 1 test
59 ≈ average ▲
3 Tests
wet handling
2 −1 %
1 test 1 test
19 −1 % ▲
2 Tests
Dry
54 +2 % ▲
2 Tests
20 −2 %
3 Tests
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking
77 +4 % ▲
1 test 1 test
24 −1 %
3 Tests
dry handling
17 ≈ average ▲
1 test 1 test
0 −2 %
‹
2 Tests
Economy
98 from 1 measurement ▲
1 test 1 test bez opotrebenia
17 −8 %
3 Tests
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)
96 +18 % ▲
1 test 1 test
25 −3 %
3 Tests
durability (wear and abrasion)
– Not measured.
13 −15 %
2 Tests
Noise and comfort
42 from 1 measurement ▲
1 test 1 test noise only
16 +1 %
3 Tests
what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)
quietness (measured and subjective noise)
74 ≈ average
1 test 1 test
87 +1 % ▲
3 Tests
ride comfort
– Not measured.
1 Not measured.
Comparison

Discipline comparison

A higher number and a longer line always mean a better tyre — also for noise (quieter), consumption (more efficient) and wear (lasts longer). PTI compared with all summer tyres · rank in size 255/40 R19 among 55 available

5.4 Kleber DYNAXER HP5 SUV
provisional PTI
5.5 Goodride SOLMAX 1 XL BSW
tested only in R17, R18
Wet
29 ≈ average
2 Tests
38 ≈ average ▲
3 Tests
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking
57 +2 % ▲
1 test 1 test
37 ≈ average
3 Tests
Aquaplaning
3 −3 %
1 test 1 test
59 ≈ average ▲
3 Tests
wet handling
2 −1 %
1 test 1 test
19 −1 % ▲
2 Tests
Dry
54 +2 % ▲
2 Tests
20 −2 %
3 Tests
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking
77 +4 % ▲
1 test 1 test
24 −1 %
3 Tests
dry handling
17 ≈ average ▲
1 test 1 test
0 −2 %
‹
2 Tests
Economy
98 from 1 measurement ▲
1 test 1 test bez opotrebenia
17 −8 %
3 Tests
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)
96 +18 % ▲
1 test 1 test
25 −3 %
3 Tests
durability (wear and abrasion)
– Not measured.
13 −15 %
2 Tests
Noise and comfort
42 from 1 measurement ▲
1 test 1 test noise only
16 +1 %
3 Tests
what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)
quietness (measured and subjective noise)
74 ≈ average
1 test 1 test
87 +1 % ▲
3 Tests
ride comfort
– Not measured.
1 Not measured.