Comparison Kleber DYNAXER UHP vs Kleber DYNAXER HP5 SUV
6.9 
DYNAXER UHP
DYNAXER UHP 5.4 
DYNAXER HP5 SUV
DYNAXER HP5 SUV Overall rating
PTI – Pneutesty Index
6,9
5,4
Discipline comparison
Wet 48 +2 % ▲
39 +2 %
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking
60 +4 % ▲
57 +2 %
Aquaplaning
12 −4 % ▲
3 −3 %
wet handling
1 −2 %
2 −1 % ▲
Dry 56 +1 %
71 +3 % ▲
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking
62 ≈ average
77 +4 % ▲
dry handling
17 ≈ average
17 ≈ average ▲
Economy 73 ≈ average
97 from 1 measurement ▲
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)
79 +1 %
96 +18 % ▲
durability (wear and abrasion)
71 +2 %
– Not measured.
Noise and comfort 85 ≈ average ▲
44 from 1 measurement
what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)
quietness (measured and subjective noise)
89 ≈ average ▲
74 ≈ average
ride comfort
75 Not measured.
– Not measured.
Technologies
Reinforced profile ✓ Only in some sizes
✓ Only in some sizes
3PMSF –
✓ Only in some sizes iba táto
Rim protection ✓ Only in some sizes iba táto
–
Comparison
Technologies
Highlighted in green — this tyre has these in addition to the others; grey ones are shared by all.
Reinforced profile* Rim protection* Reinforced profile* 3PMSF* * Only in some sizes
Comparison
Discipline comparison
A higher number and a longer line always mean a better tyre — also for noise (quieter), consumption (more efficient) and wear (lasts longer). compared with 257 summer tyres
6.9 Kleber DYNAXER UHP 
noise and comfort: only 65 % measured
noise and comfort: only 65 % measured 5.4 Kleber DYNAXER HP5 SUV 
provisional PTI
provisional PTI Wet 48 +2 % ▲
39 +2 %
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking 4 Tests 1 test 1 test
60 +4 % ▲
57 +2 %
Aquaplaning 4 Tests 1 test 1 test
12 −4 % ▲
3 −3 %
wet handling 4 Tests 1 test 1 test
1 −2 %
2 −1 % ▲
Dry 56 +1 %
71 +3 % ▲
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking 4 Tests 1 test 1 test
62 ≈ average
77 +4 % ▲
dry handling 4 Tests 1 test 1 test
17 ≈ average
17 ≈ average ▲
Economy 73 ≈ average
97 from 1 measurement ▲
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption) 4 Tests 1 test 1 test
79 +1 %
96 +18 % ▲
durability (wear and abrasion) 3 Tests
71 +2 %
– Not measured.
Noise and comfort 85 ≈ average ▲
44 from 1 measurement
what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)
quietness (measured and subjective noise) 4 Tests 1 test 1 test
89 ≈ average ▲
74 ≈ average
ride comfort
75 Not measured.
– Not measured.