4 600+ tyres 100+ tests 460 000+ prices tracked

Comparison Kleber DYNAXER UHP vs Kleber DYNAXER HP5

6.9 Summer
DYNAXER UHP
Kleber
205/40R17 84W KLEBER DYNAXER UHP XL FSL
Passenger car Sport
Rolling resistance D Wet grip A Noise A
from 97 €
6.9 Summer
DYNAXER HP5 SUV
Kleber
205/40R17 84Y Kleber DYNAXER HP5
SUV / 4×4 Standard
Rolling resistance C Wet grip A Noise B
from 91 €
6.9 DYNAXER UHP DYNAXER UHP from 97 €
6.9 DYNAXER HP5 SUV DYNAXER HP5 SUV from 91 €
Overall rating
PTI – Pneutesty Index
6,9
6,9
Price from
97 €
91 € ▲ cheapest
EU label
Rolling resistance D Wet grip A Noise A
Rolling resistance C Wet grip A Noise B
Tyre profiles
Wet Dry Economy Noise and comfort best ≈ middle of the selected Kleber DYNAXER UHP – Wet Kleber DYNAXER UHP – Dry Kleber DYNAXER UHP – Economy Kleber DYNAXER UHP – Noise and comfort Kleber DYNAXER HP5 SUV – Wet Kleber DYNAXER HP5 SUV – Dry Kleber DYNAXER HP5 SUV – Economy Kleber DYNAXER HP5 SUV – Noise and comfort

Click on a tyre name in the chart to hide or show it. The axis compares only the selected tyres with each other — the edge represents the best of them. The shape here doesn't indicate how a tyre performs overall, but which of the selected ones is better.

Discipline comparison
Wet
50 +2 % ▲
7 tests
41 +2 %
2 Tests
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking
60 +3 % ▲
4 Tests
59 +2 %
1 Test 1 test
Aquaplaning
15 −4 % ▲
4 Tests
4 −3 %
1 Test 1 test
wet handling
1 −2 %
4 Tests
1 −1 % ▲
1 Test 1 test
Dry
52 +1 %
7 tests
70 +4 % ▲
2 Tests
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking
63 ≈ average
4 Tests
77 +4 % ▲
1 Test 1 test
dry handling
13 ≈ average
4 Tests
16 ≈ average ▲
1 Test 1 test
Economy
71 ≈ average
4 Tests
97 from 1 measurement ▲
1 Test 1 test no wear measurement
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)
78 +1 %
4 Tests
95 +18 % ▲
1 Test 1 test
durability (wear and abrasion)
71 +2 %
3 Tests
– Not measured.
Noise and comfort
77 ≈ average ▲
4 Tests
30 from 1 measurement
1 Test 1 test noise only
what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)
quietness (measured and subjective noise)
87 ≈ average ▲
4 Tests
75 ≈ average
1 Test 1 test
ride comfort
73 Not measured.
– Not measured.
Technologies
Rim protection Rim protection
✓ this one only
–
Reinforced profile Reinforced profile
✓ this one only
–
Comparison

Technologies

Highlighted in green — this tyre has these in addition to the others; grey ones are shared by all.

Rim protection Rim protection Reinforced profile Reinforced profile
none
Comparison

Tyre profiles

The shape will show at a glance which of the selected tyres is stronger in which aspect.

Wet Dry Economy Noise and comfort best ≈ middle of the selected Kleber DYNAXER UHP – Wet Kleber DYNAXER UHP – Dry Kleber DYNAXER UHP – Economy Kleber DYNAXER UHP – Noise and comfort Kleber DYNAXER HP5 SUV – Wet Kleber DYNAXER HP5 SUV – Dry Kleber DYNAXER HP5 SUV – Economy Kleber DYNAXER HP5 SUV – Noise and comfort

Click on a tyre name in the chart to hide or show it. The axis compares only the selected tyres with each other — the edge represents the best of them. The shape here doesn't indicate how a tyre performs overall, but which of the selected ones is better.

Comparison

Discipline comparison

A higher number and a longer line always mean a better tyre — also for noise (quieter), consumption (more efficient) and wear (lasts longer). PTI compared with all summer tyres · rank in size 205/40 R17 among 36 available

For example, wet braking, aquaplaning, and handling — showing what makes up the category score.

Wet

🏆 Kleber DYNAXER UHP from 14 measurements · 7 tests
beats 27 of 55
50 +2,0 %
Kleber DYNAXER HP5 SUV from 4 measurements · 2 tests
beats 22 of 55
41 +2,3 %

Kleber DYNAXER UHP is the best.

Subcategories wet

wet braking

🏆 Kleber DYNAXER UHP 4 tests
beats 32 of 55
60 +3,4 %
Kleber DYNAXER HP5 SUV 1 test
beats 31 of 55
59 +2,4 %

Aquaplaning

🏆 Kleber DYNAXER UHP 4 tests
beats 6 of 42
15 −3,6 %
Kleber DYNAXER HP5 SUV 1 test
beats 2 of 42
4 −3,3 %

wet handling

Kleber DYNAXER UHP 4 tests
beats 0 of 42
1 −1,6 %
🏆 Kleber DYNAXER HP5 SUV 1 test
beats 1 of 42
1 −1,0 %

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.

Dry

Kleber DYNAXER UHP from 8 measurements · 7 tests
beats 28 of 55
52 +1,3 %
🏆 Kleber DYNAXER HP5 SUV from 2 measurements · 2 tests
beats 38 of 55
70 +3,5 %

Kleber DYNAXER HP5 SUV is the best.

Subcategories dry

dry braking

Kleber DYNAXER UHP 4 tests
beats 30 of 55
63 ≈ average
🏆 Kleber DYNAXER HP5 SUV 1 test
beats 41 of 55
77 +3,9 %

dry handling

Kleber DYNAXER UHP 4 tests
beats 8 of 42
13 ≈ average
🏆 Kleber DYNAXER HP5 SUV 1 test
beats 12 of 42
16 ≈ average

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.

Economy

Kleber DYNAXER UHP from 7 measurements · 4 tests
beats 30 of 43
71 ≈ average
🏆 Kleber DYNAXER HP5 SUV from 1 measurement · 1 test 1 test no wear measurement
beats 41 of 43
97 from 1 measurement

Kleber DYNAXER HP5 SUV is the best.

Subcategories economy

efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)

Kleber DYNAXER UHP 4 tests
beats 31 of 42
78 +1,1 %
🏆 Kleber DYNAXER HP5 SUV 1 test
beats 41 of 42
95 +17,9 %

durability (wear and abrasion)

Kleber DYNAXER UHP 3 tests
beats 26 of 35
71 +1,5 %
Kleber DYNAXER HP5 SUV
– Not measured.

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.

Noise and comfort

🏆 Kleber DYNAXER UHP from 4 measurements · 4 tests
beats 32 of 42
77 ≈ average
Kleber DYNAXER HP5 SUV from 1 measurement · 1 test 1 test noise only
beats 12 of 42
30 from 1 measurement

Kleber DYNAXER UHP is the best.

Subcategories noise and comfort

quietness (measured and subjective noise)

🏆 Kleber DYNAXER UHP 4 tests
beats 37 of 42
87 ≈ average
Kleber DYNAXER HP5 SUV 1 test
beats 29 of 42
75 ≈ average

ride comfort

Kleber DYNAXER UHP
beats 24 of 36
73 Not measured.
Kleber DYNAXER HP5 SUV
– Not measured.

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.