20 000+ reviews 4 600+ tyres 140+ tests 480 000+ prices tracked

Comparison Kleber QUADRAXER 2 vs Kleber QUADRAXER 3

Overall rating
PTI – Pneutesty Index
7,2
8,7
Discipline comparison
Snow
93 +6 % ▲
3 Tests
86 +4 %
14 tests
what it consists of Snow (3)
snow braking
90 +5 % ▲
3 Tests
84 +3 %
14 tests
snow traction
81 +17 %
1 test 1 test
86 +4 % ▲
14 tests
snow handling
92 +3 %
3 Tests
93 +3 % ▲
14 tests
Wet
41 ≈ average
6 tests
65 +4 % ▲
18 tests
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking
39 ≈ average
5 tests
61 +3 % ▲
14 tests
Aquaplaning
54 +2 %
3 Tests
90 +5 % ▲
14 tests
wet handling
31 ≈ average ▲
3 Tests
22 ≈ average
14 tests
Dry
20 −2 %
6 tests
82 +4 % ▲
18 tests
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking
25 −3 %
5 tests
94 +7 % ▲
14 tests
dry handling
9 ≈ average
3 Tests
40 ≈ average ▲
14 tests
Ice
– Not measured.
– Not measured.
Economy
66 +8 %
3 Tests
75 +4 % ▲
14 tests
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)
52 ≈ average
3 Tests
75 +5 % ▲
14 tests
durability (wear and abrasion)
78 +19 % ▲
2 Tests
66 ≈ average
4 Tests
Noise and comfort
49 ≈ average
3 Tests noise only
88 ≈ average ▲
15 tests
what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)
quietness (measured and subjective noise)
58 ≈ average
3 Tests
82 ≈ average ▲
14 tests
ride comfort
– Not measured.
83 Not measured.
Technologies
3PMSF 3PMSF
✓ Only in some sizes
–
M+S M+S
✓ Only in some sizes
–
Rim protection Rim protection
✓ Only in some sizes
–
Reinforced profile Reinforced profile
✓ Only in some sizes
–
Comparison

Technologies

Highlighted in green — this tyre has these in addition to the others; grey ones are shared by all.

3PMSF 3PMSF* M+S M+S* Rim protection Rim protection* Reinforced profile Reinforced profile*
none

* Only in some sizes

Comparison

Discipline comparison

A higher number and a longer line always mean a better tyre — also for noise (quieter), consumption (more efficient) and wear (lasts longer). compared with 105 all-season tyres

7.2 Kleber QUADRAXER 2
noise and comfort: only 20 % measured
8.7 Kleber QUADRAXER 3
noise and comfort: only 65 % measured
Snow
93 +6 % ▲
3 Tests
86 +4 %
14 tests
what it consists of Snow (3)
snow braking
90 +5 % ▲
3 Tests
84 +3 %
14 tests
snow traction
81 +17 %
1 test 1 test
86 +4 % ▲
14 tests
snow handling
92 +3 %
3 Tests
93 +3 % ▲
14 tests
Wet
41 ≈ average
6 tests
65 +4 % ▲
18 tests
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking
39 ≈ average
5 tests
61 +3 % ▲
14 tests
Aquaplaning
54 +2 %
3 Tests
90 +5 % ▲
14 tests
wet handling
31 ≈ average ▲
3 Tests
22 ≈ average
14 tests
Dry
20 −2 %
6 tests
82 +4 % ▲
18 tests
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking
25 −3 %
5 tests
94 +7 % ▲
14 tests
dry handling
9 ≈ average
3 Tests
40 ≈ average ▲
14 tests
Ice
– Not measured.
– Not measured.
Economy
66 +8 %
3 Tests
75 +4 % ▲
14 tests
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)
52 ≈ average
3 Tests
75 +5 % ▲
14 tests
durability (wear and abrasion)
78 +19 % ▲
2 Tests
66 ≈ average
4 Tests
Noise and comfort
49 ≈ average
3 Tests noise only
88 ≈ average ▲
15 tests
what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)
quietness (measured and subjective noise)
58 ≈ average
3 Tests
82 ≈ average ▲
14 tests
ride comfort
– Not measured.
83 Not measured.