20 000+ reviews 4 600+ tyres 140+ tests 470 000+ prices tracked

Comparison Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP51 vs Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52

6.0 Winter
WINTERCRAFT WP51
Kumho
WINTERCRAFT WP51
Passenger car* Standard
8.0 Winter
WINTERCRAFT WP52
Kumho
WINTERCRAFT WP52
Passenger car Standard
6.0 WINTERCRAFT WP51 WINTERCRAFT WP51
8.0 WINTERCRAFT WP52 WINTERCRAFT WP52
Overall rating
PTI – Pneutesty Index
6,0
8,0
Discipline comparison
Snow
20 −1 %
3 Tests
40 ≈ average ▲
11 tests
what it consists of Snow (3)
snow braking
19 −1 %
3 Tests
32 ≈ average ▲
9 tests
snow traction
37 −5 % ▲
1 test 1 test
27 ≈ average
6 tests
snow handling
51 ≈ average
1 test 1 test
54 ≈ average ▲
5 tests
Wet
33 −2 %
3 Tests
77 +3 % ▲
11 tests
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking
32 −4 %
3 Tests
82 +6 % ▲
9 tests
Aquaplaning
56 +4 % ▲
2 Tests
16 −6 %
6 tests weakness
wet handling
25 −4 %
2 Tests
61 ≈ average ▲
5 tests
Dry
19 −3 %
2 Tests
94 +3 % ▲
6 tests
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking
38 −4 %
2 Tests
95 +4 % ▲
6 tests
dry handling
24 −2 %
1 test 1 test
84 ≈ average ▲
4 Tests
Ice
49 +1 %
1 test 1 test
71 +2 % ▲
2 Tests
what it consists of Ice (3)
ice braking
51 ≈ average
1 test 1 test
72 +2 % ▲
2 Tests
ice traction
57 +3 %
1 test 1 test
– Not measured.
ice handling
17 −3 %
1 test 1 test
– Not measured.
Economy
17 −14 %
2 Tests bez opotrebenia
49 +4 % ▲
7 tests
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)
20 −9 % ▲
2 Tests
7 −3 %
5 tests
durability (wear and abrasion)
– Not measured.
62 +7 %
4 Tests
Noise and comfort
47 from 1 measurement ▲
1 test 1 test noise only
35 ≈ average
5 tests
what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)
quietness (measured and subjective noise)
66 ≈ average ▲
1 test 1 test
63 ≈ average
4 Tests
ride comfort
– Not measured.
13 Not measured.
Technologies
3PMSF 3PMSF
✓ Only in some sizes
–
M+S M+S
✓ Only in some sizes
–
Reinforced profile Reinforced profile
✓ Only in some sizes
–
Rim protection Rim protection
✓ Only in some sizes iba táto
–
ROF ROF
✓ Only in some sizes iba táto
–
Comparison

Technologies

Highlighted in green — this tyre has these in addition to the others; grey ones are shared by all.

3PMSF 3PMSF* M+S M+S* Reinforced profile Reinforced profile* Rim protection Rim protection* ROF (run-flat technology) ROF*
none

* Only in some sizes

Comparison

Discipline comparison

A higher number and a longer line always mean a better tyre — also for noise (quieter), consumption (more efficient) and wear (lasts longer). compared with 169 winter tyres

6.0 Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP51
noise and comfort: only 20 % measured
8.0 Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52
noise and comfort: only 65 % measured
Snow
20 −1 %
3 Tests
40 ≈ average ▲
11 tests
what it consists of Snow (3)
snow braking
19 −1 %
3 Tests
32 ≈ average ▲
9 tests
snow traction
37 −5 % ▲
1 test 1 test
27 ≈ average
6 tests
snow handling
51 ≈ average
1 test 1 test
54 ≈ average ▲
5 tests
Wet
33 −2 %
3 Tests
77 +3 % ▲
11 tests
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking
32 −4 %
3 Tests
82 +6 % ▲
9 tests
Aquaplaning
56 +4 % ▲
2 Tests
16 −6 %
6 tests weakness
wet handling
25 −4 %
2 Tests
61 ≈ average ▲
5 tests
Dry
19 −3 %
2 Tests
94 +3 % ▲
6 tests
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking
38 −4 %
2 Tests
95 +4 % ▲
6 tests
dry handling
24 −2 %
1 test 1 test
84 ≈ average ▲
4 Tests
Ice
49 +1 %
1 test 1 test
71 +2 % ▲
2 Tests
what it consists of Ice (3)
ice braking
51 ≈ average
1 test 1 test
72 +2 % ▲
2 Tests
ice traction
57 +3 %
1 test 1 test
– Not measured.
ice handling
17 −3 %
1 test 1 test
– Not measured.
Economy
17 −14 %
2 Tests bez opotrebenia
49 +4 % ▲
7 tests
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)
20 −9 % ▲
2 Tests
7 −3 %
5 tests
durability (wear and abrasion)
– Not measured.
62 +7 %
4 Tests
Noise and comfort
47 from 1 measurement ▲
1 test 1 test noise only
35 ≈ average
5 tests
what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)
quietness (measured and subjective noise)
66 ≈ average ▲
1 test 1 test
63 ≈ average
4 Tests
ride comfort
– Not measured.
13 Not measured.