Comparison Michelin ALPIN 5 vs Michelin ALPIN 7

Michelin

ALPIN 5

Passenger car Standard

Overall rating

PTI – Pneutesty Index

7,1

8,9

Discipline comparison

Snow

30 ≈ average

3 Tests len z brzdenia a ovládateľnosti

86 +3 %

13 tests

what it consists of Snow (3)

snow braking

29 ≈ average

3 Tests

87 +3 %

13 tests

snow traction

– Not measured.

88 +3 %

11 tests

snow handling

26 ≈ average

3 Tests

85 +2 %

9 tests

Wet

76 +6 %

3 Tests

80 +5 %

12 tests

what it consists of Wet (3)

wet braking

60 +4 %

3 Tests

84 +7 %

12 tests

Aquaplaning

81 +9 %

3 Tests

57 +1 %

11 tests

wet handling

76 +2 %

3 Tests

71 +2 %

8 tests

Dry

44 ≈ average

3 Tests

68 +1 %

12 tests

what it consists of Dry (2)

dry braking

39 −1 %

3 Tests

65 +2 %

12 tests

dry handling

53 ≈ average

3 Tests

71 ≈ average

6 tests

Ice

– Not measured.

99 +8 %

2 Tests

what it consists of Ice (1)

ice braking

– Not measured.

99 +8 %

2 Tests

Economy

65 +21 %

3 Tests

96 +14 %

12 tests

what it consists of Economy (2)

efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)

8 −6 %

3 Tests weakness

98 +11 %

12 tests

durability (wear and abrasion)

88 +41 %

2 Tests

86 +17 %

3 Tests

Noise and comfort

18 −2 %

3 Tests noise only

97 ≈ average

10 tests

what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)

quietness (measured and subjective noise)

27 −2 %

3 Tests

89 ≈ average

9 tests

ride comfort

– Not measured.

67 Not measured.

Technologies

3PMSF

✓ Only in some sizes

✓

M+S

✓

Rim protection

✓ Only in some sizes

Reinforced profile

✓ Only in some sizes

✓ Only in some sizes iba táto

–

ROF

✓ Only in some sizes iba táto

–

Seal

✓ Only in some sizes iba táto

–

Suitable for EVs

✓ Only in some sizes iba táto

–

Comparison

Technologies

Highlighted in green — this tyre has these in addition to the others; grey ones are shared by all.

3PMSF*

M+S

Rim protection*

Reinforced profile*

3PMSF

M+S

Rim protection*

Reinforced profile*

* Only in some sizes

Comparison

Discipline comparison

A higher number and a longer line always mean a better tyre — also for noise (quieter), consumption (more efficient) and wear (lasts longer). compared with 169 winter tyres

Michelin ALPIN 5

Michelin ALPIN 7

Snow

30 ≈ average

3 Tests len z brzdenia a ovládateľnosti

86 +3 %

13 tests

what it consists of Snow (3)

snow braking

29 ≈ average

3 Tests

87 +3 %

13 tests

snow traction

– Not measured.

88 +3 %

11 tests

snow handling

26 ≈ average

3 Tests

85 +2 %

9 tests

Wet

76 +6 %

3 Tests

80 +5 %

12 tests

what it consists of Wet (3)

wet braking

60 +4 %

3 Tests

84 +7 %

12 tests

Aquaplaning

81 +9 %

3 Tests

57 +1 %

11 tests

wet handling

76 +2 %

3 Tests

71 +2 %

8 tests

Dry

44 ≈ average

3 Tests

68 +1 %

12 tests

what it consists of Dry (2)

dry braking

39 −1 %

3 Tests

65 +2 %

12 tests

dry handling

53 ≈ average

3 Tests

71 ≈ average

6 tests

Ice

– Not measured.

99 +8 %

2 Tests

what it consists of Ice (1)

ice braking

– Not measured.

99 +8 %

2 Tests

Economy

65 +21 %

3 Tests

96 +14 %

12 tests

what it consists of Economy (2)

efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)

8 −6 %

3 Tests weakness

98 +11 %

12 tests

durability (wear and abrasion)

88 +41 %

2 Tests

86 +17 %

3 Tests

Noise and comfort

18 −2 %

3 Tests noise only

97 ≈ average

10 tests

what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)

quietness (measured and subjective noise)

27 −2 %

3 Tests

89 ≈ average

9 tests

ride comfort

– Not measured.

67 Not measured.