Comparison Michelin PRIMACY 4+ vs Michelin PRIMACY 5

Michelin

Overall rating

PTI – Pneutesty Index

8,8

Discipline comparison

Wet

81 +5 %

11 tests

76 +5 %

13 tests

what it consists of Wet (3)

wet braking

88 +7 %

10 tests

83 +7 %

13 tests

Aquaplaning

76 ≈ average

10 tests

69 +2 %

11 tests

wet handling

53 ≈ average

8 tests

66 +1 %

9 tests

Dry

79 +3 %

11 tests

49 +1 %

13 tests

what it consists of Dry (2)

dry braking

86 +4 %

10 tests

50 +1 %

13 tests

dry handling

51 ≈ average

8 tests

34 ≈ average

5 tests

Economy

95 +20 %

10 tests

97 +20 %

15 tests

what it consists of Economy (2)

efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)

75 +5 %

10 tests

92 +10 %

12 tests

durability (wear and abrasion)

96 +38 %

4 Tests

98 +39 %

5 tests

Noise and comfort

88 ≈ average

10 tests

98 ≈ average

9 tests

what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)

quietness (measured and subjective noise)

94 ≈ average

10 tests

53 ≈ average

7 tests

ride comfort

85 Not measured.

97 Not measured.

Technologies

Rim protection

✓ Only in some sizes

Suitable for EVs

✓ Only in some sizes

Reinforced profile

✓ Only in some sizes

Comparison

Technologies

Highlighted in green — this tyre has these in addition to the others; grey ones are shared by all.

Rim protection*

Suitable for EVs*

Reinforced profile*

Rim protection*

Suitable for EVs*

Reinforced profile*

* Only in some sizes

Comparison

Discipline comparison

A higher number and a longer line always mean a better tyre — also for noise (quieter), consumption (more efficient) and wear (lasts longer). compared with 257 summer tyres

Michelin PRIMACY 4+

Michelin PRIMACY 5

Wet

81 +5 %

11 tests

76 +5 %

13 tests

what it consists of Wet (3)

wet braking

88 +7 %

10 tests

83 +7 %

13 tests

Aquaplaning

76 ≈ average

10 tests

69 +2 %

11 tests

wet handling

53 ≈ average

8 tests

66 +1 %

9 tests

Dry

79 +3 %

11 tests

49 +1 %

13 tests

what it consists of Dry (2)

dry braking

86 +4 %

10 tests

50 +1 %

13 tests

dry handling

51 ≈ average

8 tests

34 ≈ average

5 tests

Economy

95 +20 %

10 tests

97 +20 %

15 tests

what it consists of Economy (2)

efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)

75 +5 %

10 tests

92 +10 %

12 tests

durability (wear and abrasion)

96 +38 %

4 Tests

98 +39 %

5 tests

Noise and comfort

88 ≈ average

10 tests

98 ≈ average

9 tests

what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)

quietness (measured and subjective noise)

94 ≈ average

10 tests

53 ≈ average

7 tests

ride comfort

85 Not measured.

97 Not measured.