Comparison Minerva FROSTRACK UHP vs Goodyear ULTRAGRIP PERFORMANCE +
5.3 
FROSTRACK UHP
FROSTRACK UHP Overall rating
PTI – Pneutesty Index
5,3
8,7
Discipline comparison
Snow 6 −4 %
94 +4 % ▲
what it consists of Snow (3)
snow braking
15 −3 %
92 +3 % ▲
snow traction
11 −6 %
97 +6 % ▲
snow handling
7 −4 %
92 +2 % ▲
Wet 4 −9 %
90 +7 % ▲
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking
5 −8 %
87 +7 % ▲
Aquaplaning
11 −24 %
86 +7 % ▲
wet handling
3 −4 %
88 +2 % ▲
Dry 97 +2 % ▲
51 ≈ average
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking
90 +3 % ▲
53 ≈ average
dry handling
97 +1 % ▲
39 ≈ average
Ice – Not measured.
– Not measured.
Economy 19 from 1 measurement
78 +4 % ▲
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)
13 −4 %
74 +4 % ▲
durability (wear and abrasion)
– Not measured.
70 +3 %
Noise and comfort 50 from 1 measurement
86 ≈ average ▲
what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)
quietness (measured and subjective noise)
72 ≈ average ▲
18 ≈ average
ride comfort
– Not measured.
91 Not measured.
Technologies
3PMSF ✓ Only in some sizes
✓ Only in some sizes
M+S ✓
✓ Only in some sizes
3D sipes –
✓ Only in some sizes iba táto
OE –
✓ Only in some sizes iba táto
Rim protection –
✓ Only in some sizes iba táto
ROF –
✓ Only in some sizes iba táto
Seal –
✓ Only in some sizes iba táto
Sound –
✓ Only in some sizes iba táto
Suitable for EVs –
✓ Only in some sizes iba táto
Reinforced profile –
✓ Only in some sizes iba táto
Comparison
Technologies
Highlighted in green — this tyre has these in addition to the others; grey ones are shared by all.
3PMSF* M+S 3PMSF* M+S* 3D sipes* OE* Rim protection* ROF* Seal* Sound* Suitable for EVs* Reinforced profile* * Only in some sizes
Comparison
Discipline comparison
A higher number and a longer line always mean a better tyre — also for noise (quieter), consumption (more efficient) and wear (lasts longer). compared with 169 winter tyres
5.3 Minerva FROSTRACK UHP 
PTI reduced by 0,3 – wet −8,4 %
PTI reduced by 0,3 – wet −8,4 % 8.7 Goodyear ULTRAGRIP PERFORMANCE + 
noise and comfort: only 65 % measured
noise and comfort: only 65 % measured Snow 6 −4 %
94 +4 % ▲
what it consists of Snow (3)
snow braking 1 test 1 test 8 tests
15 −3 %
92 +3 % ▲
snow traction 1 test 1 test 4 Tests
11 −6 %
97 +6 % ▲
snow handling 1 test 1 test 8 tests
7 −4 %
92 +2 % ▲
Wet 4 −9 %
90 +7 % ▲
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking 3 Tests 8 tests
5 −8 %
87 +7 % ▲
Aquaplaning 1 test 1 test 7 tests
11 −24 %
86 +7 % ▲
wet handling 1 test 1 test 8 tests
3 −4 %
88 +2 % ▲
Dry 97 +2 % ▲
51 ≈ average
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking 1 test 1 test 7 tests
90 +3 % ▲
53 ≈ average
dry handling 1 test 1 test 7 tests
97 +1 % ▲
39 ≈ average
Ice – Not measured.
– Not measured.
Economy 19 from 1 measurement
78 +4 % ▲
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption) 1 test 1 test 8 tests
13 −4 %
74 +4 % ▲
durability (wear and abrasion) 4 Tests
– Not measured.
70 +3 %
Noise and comfort 50 from 1 measurement
86 ≈ average ▲
what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)
quietness (measured and subjective noise) 1 test 1 test 7 tests
72 ≈ average ▲
18 ≈ average
ride comfort
– Not measured.
91 Not measured.