4 600+ tyres 100+ tests 460 000+ prices tracked

Comparison Minerva FROSTRACK UHP XL M+S vs Goodyear ULTRAGRIP PERFORMANCE +

5.6 Winter
FROSTRACK UHP
Minerva
205/50R17 93V Minerva FROSTRACK UHP XL M+S
SUV / 4×4 Standard
Rolling resistance C Wet grip C Noise B
from 86 €
8.6 Winter
ULTRAGRIP PERFORMANCE +
Goodyear
205/50R17 93V GOODYEAR ULTRAGRIP PERFORMANCE + XL RP
Passenger car Standard-sport
Rolling resistance C Wet grip C Noise B
5.6 FROSTRACK UHP FROSTRACK UHP from 86 €
8.6 ULTRAGRIP PERFORMANCE + ULTRAGRIP PERFORMANCE +
Overall rating
PTI – Pneutesty Index
5,6
8,6
Price from
86 € ▲ cheapest
–
EU label
Rolling resistance C Wet grip C Noise B
Rolling resistance C Wet grip C Noise B
Tyre profiles
Snow Wet Dry Economy Noise and comfort best of the selected middle of the selected Minerva FROSTRACK UHP – Snow Minerva FROSTRACK UHP – Wet Minerva FROSTRACK UHP – Dry Minerva FROSTRACK UHP – Economy Minerva FROSTRACK UHP – Noise and comfort Goodyear ULTRAGRIP PERFORMANCE + – Snow Goodyear ULTRAGRIP PERFORMANCE + – Wet Goodyear ULTRAGRIP PERFORMANCE + – Dry Goodyear ULTRAGRIP PERFORMANCE + – Economy Goodyear ULTRAGRIP PERFORMANCE + – Noise and comfort

Click on a tyre name in the chart to hide or show it. The axis compares only the selected tyres with each other — the edge represents the best of them. The shape here doesn't indicate how a tyre performs overall, but which of the selected ones is better.

Discipline comparison
Snow
7 −4 %
1 Test 1 test
94 +3 % ▲
11 tests
what it consists of Snow (3)
snow braking
21 −3 %
1 Test 1 test
92 +3 % ▲
8 tests
snow traction
9 −6 %
1 Test 1 test
97 +6 % ▲
4 Tests
snow handling
5 −4 %
1 Test 1 test
91 +2 % ▲
8 tests
Wet
4 −8 %
3 Tests
89 +7 % ▲
11 tests
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking
7 −7 %
3 Tests
87 +8 % ▲
8 tests
Aquaplaning
14 −24 %
1 Test 1 test
87 +7 % ▲
7 tests
wet handling
6 −4 %
1 Test 1 test
86 +2 % ▲
8 tests
Dry
97 +2 % ▲
1 Test 1 test
53 ≈ average
7 tests
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking
90 +3 % ▲
1 Test 1 test
58 ≈ average
7 tests
dry handling
97 +1 % ▲
1 Test 1 test
36 ≈ average
7 tests
Ice
– Not measured.
– Not measured.
Economy
10 from 1 measurement
1 Test 1 test no wear measurement
77 +2 % ▲
9 tests
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)
15 −4 %
1 Test 1 test
72 +3 % ▲
8 tests
durability (wear and abrasion)
– Not measured.
70 +3 %
4 Tests
Noise and comfort
46 from 1 measurement
1 Test 1 test noise only
85 ≈ average ▲
7 tests
what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)
quietness (measured and subjective noise)
71 ≈ average ▲
1 Test 1 test
20 ≈ average
7 tests
ride comfort
– Not measured.
87 Not measured.
Technologies
M+S M+S
✓
✓
3D sipes 3D sipes
–
✓ this one only
3PMSF 3PMSF
✓ this one only
–
Rim protection Rim protection
–
✓ this one only
Reinforced profile Reinforced profile
–
✓ this one only
Comparison

Technologies

Highlighted in green — this tyre has these in addition to the others; grey ones are shared by all.

M+S M+S 3PMSF 3PMSF
M+S M+S 3D sipes 3D sipes Rim protection Rim protection Reinforced profile Reinforced profile
Comparison

Tyre profiles

The shape will show at a glance which of the selected tyres is stronger in which aspect.

Snow Wet Dry Economy Noise and comfort best of the selected middle of the selected Minerva FROSTRACK UHP – Snow Minerva FROSTRACK UHP – Wet Minerva FROSTRACK UHP – Dry Minerva FROSTRACK UHP – Economy Minerva FROSTRACK UHP – Noise and comfort Goodyear ULTRAGRIP PERFORMANCE + – Snow Goodyear ULTRAGRIP PERFORMANCE + – Wet Goodyear ULTRAGRIP PERFORMANCE + – Dry Goodyear ULTRAGRIP PERFORMANCE + – Economy Goodyear ULTRAGRIP PERFORMANCE + – Noise and comfort

Click on a tyre name in the chart to hide or show it. The axis compares only the selected tyres with each other — the edge represents the best of them. The shape here doesn't indicate how a tyre performs overall, but which of the selected ones is better.

Comparison

Discipline comparison

A higher number and a longer line always mean a better tyre — also for noise (quieter), consumption (more efficient) and wear (lasts longer). PTI compared with all winter tyres · rank in size 205/50 R17 among 52 available

For example, wet braking, aquaplaning, and handling — showing what makes up the category score.

Snow

Minerva FROSTRACK UHP from 3 measurements · 1 test 1 test
beats 4 of 61
7 −4,2 %
🏆 Goodyear ULTRAGRIP PERFORMANCE + from 22 measurements · 11 tests
beats 57 of 61
94 +3,0 %

Goodyear ULTRAGRIP PERFORMANCE + is the best.

Subcategories snow

snow braking

Minerva FROSTRACK UHP 1 test
beats 10 of 61
21 −2,7 %
🏆 Goodyear ULTRAGRIP PERFORMANCE + 8 tests
beats 54 of 61
92 +3,3 %

snow traction

Minerva FROSTRACK UHP 1 test
beats 6 of 54
9 −6,3 %
🏆 Goodyear ULTRAGRIP PERFORMANCE + 4 tests
beats 52 of 54
97 +5,5 %

snow handling

Minerva FROSTRACK UHP 1 test
beats 1 of 54
5 −3,8 %
🏆 Goodyear ULTRAGRIP PERFORMANCE + 8 tests
beats 48 of 54
91 +1,8 %

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.

Wet

Minerva FROSTRACK UHP from 7 measurements · 3 tests
beats 2 of 69
4 −8,3 %
🏆 Goodyear ULTRAGRIP PERFORMANCE + from 26 measurements · 11 tests
beats 61 of 69
89 +6,9 %

Goodyear ULTRAGRIP PERFORMANCE + is the best.

Subcategories wet

wet braking

Minerva FROSTRACK UHP 3 tests
beats 3 of 69
7 −6,7 %
🏆 Goodyear ULTRAGRIP PERFORMANCE + 8 tests
beats 60 of 69
87 +7,5 %

Aquaplaning

Minerva FROSTRACK UHP 1 test
beats 8 of 57
14 −23,9 %
🏆 Goodyear ULTRAGRIP PERFORMANCE + 7 tests
beats 44 of 57
87 +7,4 %

wet handling

Minerva FROSTRACK UHP 1 test
beats 7 of 55
6 −4,1 %
🏆 Goodyear ULTRAGRIP PERFORMANCE + 8 tests
beats 47 of 55
86 +2,3 %

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.

Dry

🏆 Minerva FROSTRACK UHP from 2 measurements · 1 test 1 test
beats 54 of 56
97 +2,2 %
Goodyear ULTRAGRIP PERFORMANCE + from 14 measurements · 7 tests
beats 29 of 56
53 ≈ average

Minerva FROSTRACK UHP is the best.

Subcategories dry

dry braking

🏆 Minerva FROSTRACK UHP 1 test
beats 50 of 56
90 +2,7 %
Goodyear ULTRAGRIP PERFORMANCE + 7 tests
beats 31 of 56
58 ≈ average

dry handling

🏆 Minerva FROSTRACK UHP 1 test
beats 51 of 52
97 +1,4 %
Goodyear ULTRAGRIP PERFORMANCE + 7 tests
beats 18 of 52
36 ≈ average

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.

Economy

Minerva FROSTRACK UHP from 1 measurement · 1 test 1 test no wear measurement
beats 5 of 55
10 from 1 measurement
🏆 Goodyear ULTRAGRIP PERFORMANCE + from 12 measurements · 9 tests
beats 42 of 55
77 +2,2 %

Goodyear ULTRAGRIP PERFORMANCE + is the best.

Subcategories economy

efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)

Minerva FROSTRACK UHP 1 test
beats 10 of 55
15 −4,2 %
🏆 Goodyear ULTRAGRIP PERFORMANCE + 8 tests
beats 40 of 55
72 +3,1 %

durability (wear and abrasion)

Minerva FROSTRACK UHP
– Not measured.
Goodyear ULTRAGRIP PERFORMANCE + 4 tests
beats 37 of 50
70 +3,3 %

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.

Noise and comfort

Minerva FROSTRACK UHP from 1 measurement · 1 test 1 test noise only
beats 25 of 56
46 from 1 measurement
🏆 Goodyear ULTRAGRIP PERFORMANCE + from 7 measurements · 7 tests
beats 47 of 56
85 ≈ average

Goodyear ULTRAGRIP PERFORMANCE + is the best.

Subcategories noise and comfort

quietness (measured and subjective noise)

🏆 Minerva FROSTRACK UHP 1 test
beats 39 of 55
71 ≈ average
Goodyear ULTRAGRIP PERFORMANCE + 7 tests
beats 18 of 55
20 ≈ average

ride comfort

Minerva FROSTRACK UHP
– Not measured.
Goodyear ULTRAGRIP PERFORMANCE +
beats 33 of 38
87 Not measured.

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.