Comparison Nokian Tyres WR SNOWPROOF P vs Nokian Tyres SNOWPROOF 3P
8.1
WR SNOWPROOF P
WR SNOWPROOF P 9.1
SNOWPROOF 3P
SNOWPROOF 3P Overall rating
PTI – Pneutesty Index
8,1
9,1
Discipline comparison
38 ≈ average
62 +3 % ▲
what it consists of Snow (3)
snow braking
48 +1 %
77 +3 % ▲
snow traction
5 −1 %
25 +1 % ▲
snow handling
47 ≈ average
65 +2 % ▲
57 ≈ average
97 +11 % ▲
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking
77 +4 %
97 +12 % ▲
Aquaplaning
4 −9 %
87 +10 % ▲
wet handling
14 −4 %
97 +6 % ▲
94 +3 %
95 +4 % ▲
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking
93 +4 %
99 +6 % ▲
dry handling
76 ≈ average ▲
35 ≈ average
91 from 1 measurement
– Not measured.
what it consists of Ice (1)
ice braking
91 +5 %
– Not measured.
75 +7 % ▲
53 +7 %
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)
95 +14 % ▲
51 +4 %
durability (wear and abrasion)
53 ≈ average
– Not measured.
91 +3 % ▲
36 ≈ average
what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)
quietness (measured and subjective noise)
97 +3 % ▲
57 ≈ average
ride comfort
87 Not measured.
– Not measured.
Technologies
✓ Only in some sizes
✓
✓
✓
✓ Only in some sizes
✓ Only in some sizes
✓ Only in some sizes
✓ Only in some sizes
✓ Only in some sizes iba táto
–
–
✓ Only in some sizes iba táto
Comparison
Technologies
Highlighted in green — this tyre has these in addition to the others; grey ones are shared by all.
* Only in some sizes
Comparison
Discipline comparison
A higher number and a longer line always mean a better tyre — also for noise (quieter), consumption (more efficient) and wear (lasts longer). compared with 169 winter tyres
8.1 Nokian Tyres WR SNOWPROOF P
noise and comfort: only 65 % measured
9.1 Nokian Tyres SNOWPROOF 3P
noise and comfort: only 20 % measured
38 ≈ average
62 +3 % ▲
what it consists of Snow (3)
snow braking 5 tests 3 Tests
48 +1 %
77 +3 % ▲
snow traction 4 Tests 3 Tests
5 −1 %
25 +1 % ▲
snow handling 4 Tests 3 Tests
47 ≈ average
65 +2 % ▲
57 ≈ average
97 +11 % ▲
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking 5 tests 3 Tests
77 +4 %
97 +12 % ▲
Aquaplaning 4 Tests weakness 3 Tests
4 −9 %
87 +10 % ▲
wet handling 5 tests 3 Tests
14 −4 %
97 +6 % ▲
94 +3 %
95 +4 % ▲
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking 4 Tests 3 Tests
93 +4 %
99 +6 % ▲
dry handling 3 Tests 1 test 1 test
76 ≈ average ▲
35 ≈ average
91 from 1 measurement
– Not measured.
what it consists of Ice (1)
ice braking 1 test 1 test
91 +5 %
– Not measured.
75 +7 % ▲
53 +7 %
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption) 4 Tests 3 Tests
95 +14 % ▲
51 +4 %
durability (wear and abrasion) 2 Tests
53 ≈ average
– Not measured.
91 +3 % ▲
36 ≈ average
what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)
quietness (measured and subjective noise) 4 Tests 2 Tests
97 +3 % ▲
57 ≈ average
ride comfort
87 Not measured.
– Not measured.