20 000+ reviews 4 600+ tyres 140+ tests 480 000+ prices tracked

Comparison Nokian Tyres WR SNOWPROOF P vs Nokian Tyres SNOWPROOF 3P

8.1 Winter
WR SNOWPROOF P
Nokian Tyres
225/40R19 93V NOKIAN TYRES WR SNOWPROOF P ,XL ,Rim guard ,3PMSF
Passenger car Sport
Rolling resistance C Wet grip B Noise B
from 178 €
9.1 Winter
SNOWPROOF 3P
Nokian Tyres
225/40R19 93V NOKIAN TYRES SNOWPROOF 3P ,XL ,Rim guard ,3PMSF ,Aramid
SUV / 4×4 Standard
Rolling resistance C Wet grip A Noise B
from 170 €
8.1 WR SNOWPROOF P WR SNOWPROOF P from 178 €
9.1 SNOWPROOF 3P SNOWPROOF 3P from 170 €
Overall rating
PTI – Pneutesty Index
8,1
9,1
Price from
178 €
170 € ▲ najlacnejšia
EU štítok
Rolling resistance C Wet grip B Noise B
Rolling resistance C Wet grip A Noise B
Discipline comparison
Snow
30 ≈ average
6 tests
54 +2 % ▲
3 Tests
what it consists of Snow (3)
snow braking
48 +1 %
5 tests
77 +3 % ▲
3 Tests
snow traction
5 −1 %
‹
4 Tests
25 +1 % ▲
3 Tests
snow handling
47 ≈ average
4 Tests
65 +2 % ▲
3 Tests
Wet
50 −1 %
6 tests
94 +9 % ▲
3 Tests
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking
77 +4 %
5 tests
97 +12 % ▲
3 Tests
Aquaplaning
4 −9 %
‹
4 Tests weakness
87 +10 % ▲
3 Tests
wet handling
14 −4 %
5 tests
97 +6 % ▲
3 Tests
Dry
87 +2 %
4 Tests
90 +3 % ▲
3 Tests
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking
93 +4 %
4 Tests
99 +6 % ▲
3 Tests
dry handling
76 ≈ average ▲
3 Tests
35 ≈ average
1 test 1 test
Ice
– Not measured.
1 test 1 test
– Not measured.
what it consists of Ice (1)
ice braking
91 +5 %
1 test 1 test
– Not measured.
Economy
60 +2 % ▲
5 tests
40 +3 %
3 Tests bez opotrebenia
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)
95 +14 % ▲
4 Tests
51 +4 %
3 Tests
durability (wear and abrasion)
53 ≈ average
2 Tests
– Not measured.
Noise and comfort
86 +2 % ▲
4 Tests
23 ≈ average
2 Tests noise only
what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)
quietness (measured and subjective noise)
97 +3 % ▲
4 Tests
57 ≈ average
2 Tests
ride comfort
87 Not measured.
– Not measured.
Technologies
3PMSF 3PMSF
✓
✓
M+S M+S
✓
✓
Rim protection Rim protection
✓
✓
Reinforced profile Reinforced profile
✓
✓
Comparison

Technologies

Highlighted in green — this tyre has these in addition to the others; grey ones are shared by all.

3PMSF 3PMSF M+S M+S Rim protection Rim protection Reinforced profile Reinforced profile
3PMSF 3PMSF M+S M+S Rim protection Rim protection Reinforced profile Reinforced profile
Comparison

Discipline comparison

A higher number and a longer line always mean a better tyre — also for noise (quieter), consumption (more efficient) and wear (lasts longer). PTI compared with all winter tyres · rank in size 225/40 R19 among 31 available

8.1 Nokian Tyres WR SNOWPROOF P
tested in R19
9.1 Nokian Tyres SNOWPROOF 3P
tested only in R17, R18
Snow
30 ≈ average
6 tests
54 +2 % ▲
3 Tests
what it consists of Snow (3)
snow braking
48 +1 %
5 tests
77 +3 % ▲
3 Tests
snow traction
5 −1 %
‹
4 Tests
25 +1 % ▲
3 Tests
snow handling
47 ≈ average
4 Tests
65 +2 % ▲
3 Tests
Wet
50 −1 %
6 tests
94 +9 % ▲
3 Tests
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking
77 +4 %
5 tests
97 +12 % ▲
3 Tests
Aquaplaning
4 −9 %
‹
4 Tests weakness
87 +10 % ▲
3 Tests
wet handling
14 −4 %
5 tests
97 +6 % ▲
3 Tests
Dry
87 +2 %
4 Tests
90 +3 % ▲
3 Tests
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking
93 +4 %
4 Tests
99 +6 % ▲
3 Tests
dry handling
76 ≈ average ▲
3 Tests
35 ≈ average
1 test 1 test
Ice
– Not measured.
1 test 1 test
– Not measured.
what it consists of Ice (1)
ice braking
91 +5 %
1 test 1 test
– Not measured.
Economy
60 +2 % ▲
5 tests
40 +3 %
3 Tests bez opotrebenia
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)
95 +14 % ▲
4 Tests
51 +4 %
3 Tests
durability (wear and abrasion)
53 ≈ average
2 Tests
– Not measured.
Noise and comfort
86 +2 % ▲
4 Tests
23 ≈ average
2 Tests noise only
what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)
quietness (measured and subjective noise)
97 +3 % ▲
4 Tests
57 ≈ average
2 Tests
ride comfort
87 Not measured.
– Not measured.