20 000+ reviews 4 600+ tyres 140+ tests 480 000+ prices tracked

Comparison Nokian Tyres SNOWPROOF 3P vs Pirelli P ZERO WINTER 2

9.1 Winter
SNOWPROOF 3P
Nokian Tyres
275/35R19 100V NOKIAN TYRES SNOWPROOF 3P ,XL ,Rim guard ,3PMSF ,Aramid
SUV / 4×4 Standard
Rolling resistance C Wet grip B Noise B
from 273 €
9.4 Winter
P ZERO WINTER 2
Pirelli
275/35R19 100V PIRELLI P ZERO WINTER 2 ,XL ,RUNFLAT ,(* MOE) ,3PMSF
Passenger car Sport
Rolling resistance C Wet grip B Noise A
from 363 €
9.1 SNOWPROOF 3P SNOWPROOF 3P from 273 €
9.4 P ZERO WINTER 2 P ZERO WINTER 2 from 363 €
Overall rating
PTI – Pneutesty Index
9,1
9,4
Price from
273 € ▲ najlacnejšia
363 €
EU štítok
Rolling resistance C Wet grip B Noise B
Rolling resistance C Wet grip B Noise A
Discipline comparison
Snow
50 +2 %
3 Tests
74 +4 % ▲
4 Tests
what it consists of Snow (3)
snow braking
77 +3 %
3 Tests
87 +5 % ▲
2 Tests
snow traction
25 +1 %
3 Tests
89 +7 % ▲
2 Tests
snow handling
65 +2 %
3 Tests
76 +1 % ▲
2 Tests
Wet
92 +8 % ▲
3 Tests
88 +6 %
4 Tests
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking
97 +12 % ▲
3 Tests
95 +11 %
2 Tests
Aquaplaning
87 +10 % ▲
3 Tests
68 +6 %
4 Tests
wet handling
97 +6 %
3 Tests
100 +5 % ▲
2 Tests
Dry
87 +3 %
3 Tests
91 +2 % ▲
2 Tests
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking
99 +6 % ▲
3 Tests
85 +4 %
2 Tests
dry handling
35 ≈ average
1 test 1 test
100 +2 % ▲
2 Tests
Ice
– Not measured.
– Not measured.
1 test 1 test
what it consists of Ice (2)
ice braking
– Not measured.
58 +8 %
1 test 1 test
ice traction
– Not measured.
91 +7 %
1 test 1 test
Economy
48 +4 %
3 Tests bez opotrebenia
52 +3 % ▲
4 Tests
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)
51 +4 % ▲
3 Tests
44 +2 %
4 Tests
durability (wear and abrasion)
– Not measured.
54 +9 %
1 test 1 test
Noise and comfort
17 ≈ average
2 Tests noise only
83 +2 % ▲
4 Tests
what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)
quietness (measured and subjective noise)
57 ≈ average
2 Tests
88 +2 % ▲
2 Tests
ride comfort
– Not measured.
88 Not measured.
Technologies
3PMSF 3PMSF
✓
✓
M+S M+S
✓
✓
Reinforced profile Reinforced profile
✓
✓
OE OE
–
✓ iba táto
Rim protection Rim protection
✓ iba táto
–
ROF ROF
–
✓ iba táto
Comparison

Technologies

Highlighted in green — this tyre has these in addition to the others; grey ones are shared by all.

3PMSF 3PMSF M+S M+S Reinforced profile Reinforced profile Rim protection Rim protection
3PMSF 3PMSF M+S M+S Reinforced profile Reinforced profile OE OE ROF (run-flat technology) ROF
Comparison

Discipline comparison

A higher number and a longer line always mean a better tyre — also for noise (quieter), consumption (more efficient) and wear (lasts longer). PTI compared with all winter tyres · rank in size 275/35 R19 among 22 available

9.1 Nokian Tyres SNOWPROOF 3P
tested only in R17, R18
9.4 Pirelli P ZERO WINTER 2
tested in R19
Snow
50 +2 %
3 Tests
74 +4 % ▲
4 Tests
what it consists of Snow (3)
snow braking
77 +3 %
3 Tests
87 +5 % ▲
2 Tests
snow traction
25 +1 %
3 Tests
89 +7 % ▲
2 Tests
snow handling
65 +2 %
3 Tests
76 +1 % ▲
2 Tests
Wet
92 +8 % ▲
3 Tests
88 +6 %
4 Tests
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking
97 +12 % ▲
3 Tests
95 +11 %
2 Tests
Aquaplaning
87 +10 % ▲
3 Tests
68 +6 %
4 Tests
wet handling
97 +6 %
3 Tests
100 +5 % ▲
2 Tests
Dry
87 +3 %
3 Tests
91 +2 % ▲
2 Tests
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking
99 +6 % ▲
3 Tests
85 +4 %
2 Tests
dry handling
35 ≈ average
1 test 1 test
100 +2 % ▲
2 Tests
Ice
– Not measured.
– Not measured.
1 test 1 test
what it consists of Ice (2)
ice braking
– Not measured.
58 +8 %
1 test 1 test
ice traction
– Not measured.
91 +7 %
1 test 1 test
Economy
48 +4 %
3 Tests bez opotrebenia
52 +3 % ▲
4 Tests
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)
51 +4 % ▲
3 Tests
44 +2 %
4 Tests
durability (wear and abrasion)
– Not measured.
54 +9 %
1 test 1 test
Noise and comfort
17 ≈ average
2 Tests noise only
83 +2 % ▲
4 Tests
what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)
quietness (measured and subjective noise)
57 ≈ average
2 Tests
88 +2 % ▲
2 Tests
ride comfort
– Not measured.
88 Not measured.