Comparison Pirelli PZERO (PZ5) vs Goodride SOLMAX 1 XL BSW
8.9 
PZERO (PZ5)
PZERO (PZ5) 5.5 
SOLMAX 1 XL BSW
SOLMAX 1 XL BSW Overall rating
PTI – Pneutesty Index
8,9
5,5
Discipline comparison
Wet 92 +8 % ▲
51 +1 %
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking
87 +11 % ▲
37 ≈ average
Aquaplaning
36 ≈ average
59 ≈ average ▲
wet handling
96 +5 % ▲
19 −1 %
Dry 97 +5 % ▲
19 ≈ average
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking
95 +7 % ▲
24 −1 %
dry handling
96 +2 % ▲
0 −2 %
Economy 23 −6 % ▲
12 −11 %
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)
13 −9 %
25 −3 % ▲
durability (wear and abrasion)
– Not measured.
13 −15 %
Noise and comfort 76 ≈ average ▲
10 +1 %
what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)
quietness (measured and subjective noise)
80 ≈ average
87 +1 % ▲
ride comfort
31 Not measured. ▲
1 Not measured.
Technologies
OE ✓ Only in some sizes iba táto
–
Rim protection ✓ Only in some sizes iba táto
–
ROF ✓ Only in some sizes iba táto
–
Seal ✓ Only in some sizes iba táto
–
Sound ✓ Only in some sizes iba táto
–
Suitable for EVs ✓ Only in some sizes iba táto
–
Reinforced profile ✓ Only in some sizes iba táto
–
Comparison
Technologies
Highlighted in green — this tyre has these in addition to the others; grey ones are shared by all.
OE* Rim protection* ROF* Seal* Sound* Suitable for EVs* Reinforced profile* none
* Only in some sizes
Comparison
Discipline comparison
A higher number and a longer line always mean a better tyre — also for noise (quieter), consumption (more efficient) and wear (lasts longer). compared with 257 summer tyres
8.9 Pirelli PZERO (PZ5) 
incomplete measurement: no wear measurement
incomplete measurement: no wear measurement 5.5 Goodride SOLMAX 1 XL BSW noise and comfort: only 65 % measured
noise and comfort: only 65 % measured Wet 92 +8 % ▲
51 +1 %
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking 6 tests 3 Tests
87 +11 % ▲
37 ≈ average
Aquaplaning 6 tests 3 Tests
36 ≈ average
59 ≈ average ▲
wet handling 6 tests 2 Tests
96 +5 % ▲
19 −1 %
Dry 97 +5 % ▲
19 ≈ average
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking 6 tests 3 Tests
95 +7 % ▲
24 −1 %
dry handling 6 tests 2 Tests
96 +2 % ▲
0 −2 %
Economy 23 −6 % ▲
12 −11 %
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption) 6 tests 3 Tests
13 −9 %
25 −3 % ▲
durability (wear and abrasion) 2 Tests
– Not measured.
13 −15 %
Noise and comfort 76 ≈ average ▲
10 +1 %
what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)
quietness (measured and subjective noise) 3 Tests 3 Tests
80 ≈ average
87 +1 % ▲
ride comfort
31 Not measured. ▲
1 Not measured.