Comparison Vredestein QUATRAC PRO 2 vs Kumho SOLUS 4S HA32
7.2 
QUATRAC PRO 2
QUATRAC PRO 2 7.0 
SOLUS 4S HA32
SOLUS 4S HA32 Overall rating
PTI – Pneutesty Index
7,2
7,0
Discipline comparison
Snow 47 ≈ average
56 ≈ average ▲
what it consists of Snow (3)
snow braking
48 Not measured.
72 +3 % ▲
snow traction
– Not measured.
15 −5 %
snow handling
55 Not measured. ▲
46 ≈ average
Wet 61 +4 % ▲
57 +3 %
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking
67 Not measured. ▲
60 +3 %
Aquaplaning
29 Not measured.
37 −1 % ▲
wet handling
66 Not measured. ▲
43 ≈ average
Dry 53 ≈ average ▲
46 ≈ average
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking
45 Not measured.
48 −2 % ▲
dry handling
68 Not measured. ▲
47 ≈ average
Ice – Not measured.
– Not measured.
Economy 52 +3 % ▲
47 ≈ average
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)
34 Not measured. ▲
26 −6 %
durability (wear and abrasion)
64 Not measured. ▲
61 +5 %
Noise and comfort 30 ≈ average
54 ≈ average ▲
what it consists of Noise and comfort (1)
quietness (measured and subjective noise)
43 Not measured.
70 ≈ average ▲
Technologies
3PMSF ✓
✓ Only in some sizes
Reinforced profile ✓ Only in some sizes
✓ Only in some sizes
M+S –
✓ Only in some sizes iba táto
Rim protection –
✓ Only in some sizes iba táto
Suitable for EVs ✓ iba táto
–
Comparison
Technologies
Highlighted in green — this tyre has these in addition to the others; grey ones are shared by all.
3PMSF Reinforced profile* Suitable for EVs 3PMSF* Reinforced profile* M+S* Rim protection* * Only in some sizes
Comparison
Discipline comparison
A higher number and a longer line always mean a better tyre — also for noise (quieter), consumption (more efficient) and wear (lasts longer). compared with 105 all-season tyres
7.2 Vredestein QUATRAC PRO 2 
new model – predecessor's PTI
new model – predecessor's PTI 7.0 Kumho SOLUS 4S HA32 
noise and comfort: only 20 % measured
noise and comfort: only 20 % measured Snow 47 ≈ average
56 ≈ average ▲
what it consists of Snow (3)
snow braking 2 Tests
48 Not measured.
72 +3 % ▲
snow traction 1 test 1 test
– Not measured.
15 −5 %
snow handling 2 Tests
55 Not measured. ▲
46 ≈ average
Wet 61 +4 % ▲
57 +3 %
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking 3 Tests
67 Not measured. ▲
60 +3 %
Aquaplaning 2 Tests
29 Not measured.
37 −1 % ▲
wet handling 2 Tests
66 Not measured. ▲
43 ≈ average
Dry 53 ≈ average ▲
46 ≈ average
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking 3 Tests
45 Not measured.
48 −2 % ▲
dry handling 2 Tests
68 Not measured. ▲
47 ≈ average
Ice – Not measured.
– Not measured.
Economy 52 +3 % ▲
47 ≈ average
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption) 2 Tests
34 Not measured. ▲
26 −6 %
durability (wear and abrasion) 2 Tests
64 Not measured. ▲
61 +5 %
Noise and comfort 30 ≈ average
54 ≈ average ▲
what it consists of Noise and comfort (1)
quietness (measured and subjective noise) 2 Tests
43 Not measured.
70 ≈ average ▲