20 000+ reviews 4 600+ tyres 140+ tests 480 000+ prices tracked

Comparison Vredestein QUATRAC PRO 2 vs Kumho SOLUS 4S HA32

7.2 QUATRAC PRO 2 QUATRAC PRO 2 from 164 €
7.0 SOLUS 4S HA32 SOLUS 4S HA32 from 129 €
Overall rating
PTI – Pneutesty Index
7,2
7,0
Price from
164 €
129 € ▲ najlacnejšia
EU štítok
Rolling resistance C Wet grip A Noise A
Rolling resistance C Wet grip A Noise B
Discipline comparison
Snow
– Not measured.
46 ≈ average
2 Tests
what it consists of Snow (3)
snow braking
48 Not measured.
72 +3 % ▲
2 Tests
snow traction
– Not measured.
15 −5 %
1 test 1 test
snow handling
55 Not measured. ▲
46 ≈ average
2 Tests
Wet
– Not measured.
41 ≈ average
5 tests
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking
67 Not measured. ▲
60 +3 %
3 Tests
Aquaplaning
29 Not measured.
37 −1 % ▲
2 Tests
wet handling
66 Not measured. ▲
43 ≈ average
2 Tests
Dry
– Not measured.
34 −2 %
5 tests
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking
45 Not measured.
48 −2 % ▲
3 Tests
dry handling
68 Not measured. ▲
47 ≈ average
2 Tests
Ice
– Not measured.
– Not measured.
Economy
– Not measured.
46 +1 %
2 Tests
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)
34 Not measured. ▲
26 −6 %
2 Tests
durability (wear and abrasion)
64 Not measured. ▲
61 +5 %
2 Tests
Noise and comfort
– Not measured.
33 ≈ average
2 Tests noise only
what it consists of Noise and comfort (1)
quietness (measured and subjective noise)
43 Not measured.
70 ≈ average ▲
2 Tests
Technologies
3PMSF 3PMSF
✓
✓
Reinforced profile Reinforced profile
✓
✓
Rim protection Rim protection
–
✓ iba táto
Suitable for EVs Suitable for EVs
✓ iba táto
–
Comparison

Technologies

Highlighted in green — this tyre has these in addition to the others; grey ones are shared by all.

3PMSF 3PMSF Reinforced profile Reinforced profile Suitable for EVs Suitable for EVs
3PMSF 3PMSF Reinforced profile Reinforced profile Rim protection Rim protection
Comparison

Discipline comparison

A higher number and a longer line always mean a better tyre — also for noise (quieter), consumption (more efficient) and wear (lasts longer). PTI compared with all all-season tyres · rank in size 235/40 R19 among 28 available

7.2 Vredestein QUATRAC PRO 2
new model – predecessor's PTI
7.0 Kumho SOLUS 4S HA32
tested only in R16, R17
Snow
– Not measured.
46 ≈ average
2 Tests
what it consists of Snow (3)
snow braking
48 Not measured.
72 +3 % ▲
2 Tests
snow traction
– Not measured.
15 −5 %
1 test 1 test
snow handling
55 Not measured. ▲
46 ≈ average
2 Tests
Wet
– Not measured.
41 ≈ average
5 tests
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking
67 Not measured. ▲
60 +3 %
3 Tests
Aquaplaning
29 Not measured.
37 −1 % ▲
2 Tests
wet handling
66 Not measured. ▲
43 ≈ average
2 Tests
Dry
– Not measured.
34 −2 %
5 tests
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking
45 Not measured.
48 −2 % ▲
3 Tests
dry handling
68 Not measured. ▲
47 ≈ average
2 Tests
Ice
– Not measured.
– Not measured.
Economy
– Not measured.
46 +1 %
2 Tests
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)
34 Not measured. ▲
26 −6 %
2 Tests
durability (wear and abrasion)
64 Not measured. ▲
61 +5 %
2 Tests
Noise and comfort
– Not measured.
33 ≈ average
2 Tests noise only
what it consists of Noise and comfort (1)
quietness (measured and subjective noise)
43 Not measured.
70 ≈ average ▲
2 Tests