20 000+ reviews 4 600+ tyres 140+ tests 480 000+ prices tracked

Comparison Vredestein QUATRAC PRO+ vs Vredestein QUATRAC PRO 2

7.4 All-season
QUATRAC PRO+
Vredestein
205/55R17 95V VREDESTEIN QUATRAC PRO+ ,XL ,FSL ,3PMSF
Passenger car Standard-sport
Rolling resistance C Wet grip B Noise B
from 116 €
7.2 All-season
QUATRAC PRO 2
Vredestein
205/55R17 95V VREDESTEIN QUATRAC PRO 2 ,XL ,3pmsf
SUV / 4×4 Standard
Rolling resistance C Wet grip A Noise A
from 119 €
7.4 QUATRAC PRO+ QUATRAC PRO+ from 116 €
7.2 QUATRAC PRO 2 QUATRAC PRO 2 from 119 €
Overall rating
PTI – Pneutesty Index
7,4
7,2
Price from
116 € ▲ najlacnejšia
119 €
EU štítok
Rolling resistance C Wet grip B Noise B
Rolling resistance C Wet grip A Noise A
Discipline comparison
Snow
15 −3 %
15 tests
– Not measured.
what it consists of Snow (3)
snow braking
9 −3 %
14 tests
48 Not measured. ▲
snow traction
12 −3 %
15 tests
– Not measured.
snow handling
23 ≈ average
14 tests
55 Not measured. ▲
Wet
81 +6 %
15 tests
– Not measured.
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking
88 +9 % ▲
15 tests
67 Not measured.
Aquaplaning
28 ≈ average
14 tests
29 Not measured. ▲
wet handling
84 +2 % ▲
15 tests
66 Not measured.
Dry
50 ≈ average
13 tests
– Not measured.
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking
42 ≈ average
14 tests
45 Not measured. ▲
dry handling
49 ≈ average
12 tests
68 Not measured. ▲
Ice
– Not measured.
2 Tests
– Not measured.
what it consists of Ice (2)
ice braking
7 −8 %
3 Tests
– Not measured.
ice traction
19 −6 %
1 test 1 test
– Not measured.
Economy
23 −5 %
14 tests
– Not measured.
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)
23 −5 %
14 tests
34 Not measured. ▲
durability (wear and abrasion)
26 −3 %
1 test 1 test
64 Not measured. ▲
Noise and comfort
76 ≈ average
13 tests
– Not measured.
what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)
quietness (measured and subjective noise)
88 ≈ average ▲
13 tests
43 Not measured.
ride comfort
46 Not measured.
– Not measured.
Technologies
3PMSF 3PMSF
–
✓
Suitable for EVs Suitable for EVs
–
✓
Reinforced profile Reinforced profile
–
✓
Comparison

Technologies

Highlighted in green — this tyre has these in addition to the others; grey ones are shared by all.

none
3PMSF 3PMSF Suitable for EVs Suitable for EVs Reinforced profile Reinforced profile
Comparison

Discipline comparison

A higher number and a longer line always mean a better tyre — also for noise (quieter), consumption (more efficient) and wear (lasts longer). PTI compared with all all-season tyres · rank in size 205/55 R17 among 48 available

7.4 Vredestein QUATRAC PRO+
tested in R17
7.2 Vredestein QUATRAC PRO 2
new model – predecessor's PTI
Snow
15 −3 %
15 tests
– Not measured.
what it consists of Snow (3)
snow braking
9 −3 %
14 tests
48 Not measured. ▲
snow traction
12 −3 %
15 tests
– Not measured.
snow handling
23 ≈ average
14 tests
55 Not measured. ▲
Wet
81 +6 %
15 tests
– Not measured.
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking
88 +9 % ▲
15 tests
67 Not measured.
Aquaplaning
28 ≈ average
14 tests
29 Not measured. ▲
wet handling
84 +2 % ▲
15 tests
66 Not measured.
Dry
50 ≈ average
13 tests
– Not measured.
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking
42 ≈ average
14 tests
45 Not measured. ▲
dry handling
49 ≈ average
12 tests
68 Not measured. ▲
Ice
– Not measured.
2 Tests
– Not measured.
what it consists of Ice (2)
ice braking
7 −8 %
3 Tests
– Not measured.
ice traction
19 −6 %
1 test 1 test
– Not measured.
Economy
23 −5 %
14 tests
– Not measured.
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)
23 −5 %
14 tests
34 Not measured. ▲
durability (wear and abrasion)
26 −3 %
1 test 1 test
64 Not measured. ▲
Noise and comfort
76 ≈ average
13 tests
– Not measured.
what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)
quietness (measured and subjective noise)
88 ≈ average ▲
13 tests
43 Not measured.
ride comfort
46 Not measured.
– Not measured.