Comparison Vredestein Ultrac Satin vs Vredestein ULTRAC

Vredestein

Overall rating

PTI – Pneutesty Index

7,5

7,9

Discipline comparison

Wet

65 +3 %

9 tests

92 +6 %

14 tests

what it consists of Wet (3)

wet braking

63 +2 %

9 tests

79 +6 %

12 tests

Aquaplaning

88 +6 %

6 tests

97 +5 %

12 tests

wet handling

55 ≈ average

9 tests

92 +3 %

11 tests

Dry

34 −2 %

9 tests

75 +2 %

14 tests

what it consists of Dry (2)

dry braking

25 −4 %

9 tests

79 +3 %

12 tests

dry handling

26 ≈ average

7 tests

56 ≈ average

10 tests

Economy

54 ≈ average

7 tests

9 −11 %

12 tests

what it consists of Economy (2)

efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)

51 ≈ average

6 tests

21 −2 %

12 tests

durability (wear and abrasion)

54 −7 %

1 test

2 −37 %

3 Tests

Noise and comfort

100 ≈ average

6 tests

73 ≈ average

12 tests

what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)

quietness (measured and subjective noise)

96 ≈ average

4 Tests

11 ≈ average

11 tests

ride comfort

90 Not measured.

77 Not measured.

Technologies

✓ Only in some sizes

Rim protection

✓ Only in some sizes

Reinforced profile

✓ Only in some sizes

Suitable for EVs

–

✓ Only in some sizes iba táto

Comparison

Technologies

Highlighted in green — this tyre has these in addition to the others; grey ones are shared by all.

OE*

Rim protection*

Reinforced profile*

OE*

Rim protection*

Reinforced profile*

* Only in some sizes

Comparison

Discipline comparison

A higher number and a longer line always mean a better tyre — also for noise (quieter), consumption (more efficient) and wear (lasts longer). compared with 257 summer tyres

Vredestein Ultrac Satin

Vredestein ULTRAC

Wet

65 +3 %

9 tests

92 +6 %

14 tests

what it consists of Wet (3)

wet braking

63 +2 %

9 tests

79 +6 %

12 tests

Aquaplaning

88 +6 %

6 tests

97 +5 %

12 tests

wet handling

55 ≈ average

9 tests

92 +3 %

11 tests

Dry

34 −2 %

9 tests

75 +2 %

14 tests

what it consists of Dry (2)

dry braking

25 −4 %

9 tests

79 +3 %

12 tests

dry handling

26 ≈ average

7 tests

56 ≈ average

10 tests

Economy

54 ≈ average

7 tests

9 −11 %

12 tests

what it consists of Economy (2)

efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)

51 ≈ average

6 tests

21 −2 %

12 tests

durability (wear and abrasion)

54 −7 %

1 test

2 −37 %

3 Tests

Noise and comfort

100 ≈ average

6 tests

73 ≈ average

12 tests

what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)

quietness (measured and subjective noise)

96 ≈ average

4 Tests

11 ≈ average

11 tests

ride comfort

90 Not measured.

77 Not measured.