4 600+ tyres 100+ tests 460 000+ prices tracked

Comparison Yokohama V105 vs Yokohama V107

6.2 V105 V105 from 113 €
7.3 V107 V107 from 109 €
Overall rating
PTI – Pneutesty Index
6,2
7,3
Price from
113 €
109 € ▲ cheapest
EU label
Rolling resistance C Wet grip B Noise B
Rolling resistance D Wet grip A Noise B
Tyre profiles
Wet Dry Economy Noise and comfort best of the selected middle of the selected Yokohama V105 – Wet Yokohama V105 – Dry Yokohama V105 – Economy Yokohama V105 – Noise and comfort Yokohama V107 – Wet Yokohama V107 – Dry Yokohama V107 – Economy Yokohama V107 – Noise and comfort

Click on a tyre name in the chart to hide or show it. The axis compares only the selected tyres with each other — the edge represents the best of them. The shape here doesn't indicate how a tyre performs overall, but which of the selected ones is better.

Discipline comparison
Wet
22 −2 %
4 Tests
53 +3 % ▲
12 tests
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking
22 −1 %
4 Tests
69 +7 % ▲
8 tests
Aquaplaning
56 +1 % ▲
3 Tests
40 +1 %
9 tests
wet handling
55 +1 % ▲
3 Tests
47 +2 %
7 tests
Dry
43 ≈ average
4 Tests
96 +4 % ▲
12 tests
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking
54 ≈ average
4 Tests
99 +7 % ▲
8 tests
dry handling
85 +2 %
2 Tests
96 +2 % ▲
8 tests
Economy
12 −10 % ▲
2 Tests no wear measurement
3 −15 %
8 tests
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)
5 −17 % ▲
2 Tests
0 −20 %
8 tests
durability (wear and abrasion)
– Not measured.
20 −12 %
5 tests
Noise and comfort
2 −2 %
3 Tests
3 −1 % ▲
7 tests
what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)
quietness (measured and subjective noise)
11 −2 % ▲
3 Tests
5 −1 %
5 tests
ride comfort
5 Not measured. ▲
4 Not measured.
Technologies
Rim protection Rim protection
✓
✓
Reinforced profile Reinforced profile
✓
✓
OE OE
✓ this one only
–
Comparison

Technologies

Highlighted in green — this tyre has these in addition to the others; grey ones are shared by all.

Rim protection Rim protection Reinforced profile Reinforced profile OE OE
Rim protection Rim protection Reinforced profile Reinforced profile
Comparison

Tyre profiles

The shape will show at a glance which of the selected tyres is stronger in which aspect.

Wet Dry Economy Noise and comfort best of the selected middle of the selected Yokohama V105 – Wet Yokohama V105 – Dry Yokohama V105 – Economy Yokohama V105 – Noise and comfort Yokohama V107 – Wet Yokohama V107 – Dry Yokohama V107 – Economy Yokohama V107 – Noise and comfort

Click on a tyre name in the chart to hide or show it. The axis compares only the selected tyres with each other — the edge represents the best of them. The shape here doesn't indicate how a tyre performs overall, but which of the selected ones is better.

Comparison

Discipline comparison

A higher number and a longer line always mean a better tyre — also for noise (quieter), consumption (more efficient) and wear (lasts longer). PTI compared with all summer tyres · rank in size 245/40 R18 among 72 available

For example, wet braking, aquaplaning, and handling — showing what makes up the category score.

Wet

Yokohama V105 from 10 measurements · 4 tests
beats 20 of 94
22 −2,0 %
🏆 Yokohama V107 from 36 measurements · 12 tests
beats 49 of 94
53 +3,2 %

Yokohama V107 is the best.

Subcategories wet

wet braking

Yokohama V105 4 tests
beats 12 of 94
22 −1,3 %
🏆 Yokohama V107 8 tests
beats 54 of 94
69 +6,8 %

Aquaplaning

🏆 Yokohama V105 3 tests
beats 39 of 78
56 +1,2 %
Yokohama V107 9 tests
beats 22 of 78
40 +1,4 %

wet handling

🏆 Yokohama V105 3 tests
beats 35 of 81
55 +1,4 %
Yokohama V107 7 tests
beats 30 of 81
47 +1,9 %

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.

Dry

Yokohama V105 from 6 measurements · 4 tests
beats 40 of 94
43 ≈ average
🏆 Yokohama V107 from 16 measurements · 12 tests
beats 90 of 94
96 +4,3 %

Yokohama V107 is the best.

Subcategories dry

dry braking

Yokohama V105 4 tests
beats 33 of 94
54 ≈ average
🏆 Yokohama V107 8 tests
beats 91 of 94
99 +7,0 %

dry handling

Yokohama V105 2 tests
beats 60 of 82
85 +1,7 %
🏆 Yokohama V107 8 tests
beats 75 of 82
96 +2,4 %

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.

Economy

🏆 Yokohama V105 from 2 measurements · 2 tests no wear measurement
beats 9 of 81
12 −10,0 %
Yokohama V107 from 16 measurements · 8 tests
beats 2 of 81
3 −14,9 %

Yokohama V105 is the best.

Subcategories economy

efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)

🏆 Yokohama V105 2 tests
beats 6 of 79
5 −16,6 %
Yokohama V107 8 tests
beats 0 of 79
0 −19,7 %

durability (wear and abrasion)

Yokohama V105
– Not measured.
Yokohama V107 5 tests
beats 13 of 57
20 −11,6 %

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.

Noise and comfort

Yokohama V105 from 3 measurements · 3 tests
beats 1 of 78
2 −2,1 %
🏆 Yokohama V107 from 5 measurements · 7 tests
beats 2 of 78
3 −1,1 %

Yokohama V107 is the best.

Subcategories noise and comfort

quietness (measured and subjective noise)

🏆 Yokohama V105 3 tests
beats 13 of 77
11 −2,1 %
Yokohama V107 5 tests
beats 6 of 77
5 −1,1 %

ride comfort

🏆 Yokohama V105
beats 3 of 67
5 Not measured.
Yokohama V107
beats 2 of 67
4 Not measured.

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.