4 600+ tyres 100+ tests 460 000+ prices tracked

Comparison Yokohama BLUEARTH-A AE50 vs Yokohama AE51

6.9 Summer
BLUEARTH-A AE50
Yokohama
BLUEARTH-A AE50
Passenger car Eco-standard
6.1 Summer
AE51
Yokohama
AE51
Passenger car Eco-standard
6.9 BLUEARTH-A AE50 BLUEARTH-A AE50
6.1 AE51 AE51
Overall rating
PTI – Pneutesty Index
6,9
6,1
Tyre profiles
Wet Dry Economy Noise and comfort best of the selected middle of the selected Yokohama BLUEARTH-A AE50 – Wet Yokohama BLUEARTH-A AE50 – Dry Yokohama BLUEARTH-A AE50 – Economy Yokohama BLUEARTH-A AE50 – Noise and comfort Yokohama AE51 – Wet Yokohama AE51 – Dry Yokohama AE51 – Economy Yokohama AE51 – Noise and comfort

Click on a tyre name in the chart to hide or show it. The axis compares only the selected tyres with each other — the edge represents the best of them. The shape here doesn't indicate how a tyre performs overall, but which of the selected ones is better.

Discipline comparison
Wet
46 +2 % ▲
2 Tests
29 −2 %
3 Tests
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking
57 +4 % ▲
2 Tests
33 −2 %
3 Tests
Aquaplaning
22 −2 % ▲
2 Tests
14 −3 %
2 Tests
wet handling
33 −1 % ▲
2 Tests
15 −3 %
2 Tests
Dry
48 ≈ average ▲
2 Tests
31 ≈ average
3 Tests
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking
26 −1 %
2 Tests
33 ≈ average ▲
3 Tests
dry handling
69 ≈ average ▲
2 Tests
8 −1 %
1 Test 1 test
Economy
90 +10 % ▲
2 Tests no wear measurement
77 from 1 measurement
1 Test 1 test no wear measurement
what it consists of Economy (1)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)
91 +10 % ▲
2 Tests
77 +14 %
1 Test 1 test
Noise and comfort
71 ≈ average ▲
2 Tests
34 ≈ average
2 Tests noise only
what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)
quietness (measured and subjective noise)
63 ≈ average ▲
2 Tests
51 ≈ average
2 Tests
ride comfort
65 Not measured.
– Not measured.
Technologies
Rim protection Rim protection
✓ Only in some sizes
✓ Only in some sizes
Reinforced profile Reinforced profile
✓ Only in some sizes
✓ Only in some sizes
OE OE
–
✓ Only in some sizes this one only
Comparison

Technologies

Highlighted in green — this tyre has these in addition to the others; grey ones are shared by all.

Rim protection Rim protection* Reinforced profile Reinforced profile*
Rim protection Rim protection* Reinforced profile Reinforced profile* OE OE*

* Only in some sizes

Comparison

Tyre profiles

The shape will show at a glance which of the selected tyres is stronger in which aspect.

Wet Dry Economy Noise and comfort best of the selected middle of the selected Yokohama BLUEARTH-A AE50 – Wet Yokohama BLUEARTH-A AE50 – Dry Yokohama BLUEARTH-A AE50 – Economy Yokohama BLUEARTH-A AE50 – Noise and comfort Yokohama AE51 – Wet Yokohama AE51 – Dry Yokohama AE51 – Economy Yokohama AE51 – Noise and comfort

Click on a tyre name in the chart to hide or show it. The axis compares only the selected tyres with each other — the edge represents the best of them. The shape here doesn't indicate how a tyre performs overall, but which of the selected ones is better.

Comparison

Discipline comparison

A higher number and a longer line always mean a better tyre — also for noise (quieter), consumption (more efficient) and wear (lasts longer). compared with 257 summer tyres

For example, wet braking, aquaplaning, and handling — showing what makes up the category score.

Wet

🏆 Yokohama BLUEARTH-A AE50 from 6 measurements · 2 tests
beats 117 of 256
46 +2,2 %
Yokohama AE51 from 7 measurements · 3 tests
beats 75 of 256
29 −1,5 %

Yokohama BLUEARTH-A AE50 is the best.

Subcategories wet

wet braking

🏆 Yokohama BLUEARTH-A AE50 2 tests
beats 145 of 256
57 +4,2 %
Yokohama AE51 3 tests
beats 84 of 256
33 −1,5 %

Aquaplaning

🏆 Yokohama BLUEARTH-A AE50 2 tests
beats 45 of 205
22 −1,9 %
Yokohama AE51 2 tests
beats 28 of 205
14 −3,2 %

wet handling

🏆 Yokohama BLUEARTH-A AE50 2 tests
beats 67 of 204
33 −1,3 %
Yokohama AE51 2 tests
beats 30 of 204
15 −2,8 %

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.

Dry

🏆 Yokohama BLUEARTH-A AE50 from 4 measurements · 2 tests
beats 123 of 257
48 ≈ average
Yokohama AE51 from 4 measurements · 3 tests
beats 80 of 257
31 ≈ average

Yokohama BLUEARTH-A AE50 is the best.

Subcategories dry

dry braking

Yokohama BLUEARTH-A AE50 2 tests
beats 66 of 256
26 −1,4 %
🏆 Yokohama AE51 3 tests
beats 84 of 256
33 ≈ average

dry handling

🏆 Yokohama BLUEARTH-A AE50 2 tests
beats 140 of 203
69 ≈ average
Yokohama AE51 1 test
beats 15 of 203
8 −1,4 %

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.

Economy

🏆 Yokohama BLUEARTH-A AE50 from 2 measurements · 2 tests no wear measurement
beats 185 of 207
90 +10,4 %
Yokohama AE51 from 1 measurement · 1 test 1 test no wear measurement
beats 158 of 207
77 from 1 measurement

Yokohama BLUEARTH-A AE50 is the best.

Subcategories economy

efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)

🏆 Yokohama BLUEARTH-A AE50 2 tests
beats 186 of 205
91 +10,1 %
Yokohama AE51 1 test
beats 158 of 205
77 +14,0 %

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.

Noise and comfort

🏆 Yokohama BLUEARTH-A AE50 from 2 measurements · 2 tests
beats 145 of 204
71 ≈ average
Yokohama AE51 from 2 measurements · 2 tests noise only
beats 69 of 204
34 ≈ average

Yokohama BLUEARTH-A AE50 is the best.

Subcategories noise and comfort

quietness (measured and subjective noise)

🏆 Yokohama BLUEARTH-A AE50 2 tests
beats 126 of 202
63 ≈ average
Yokohama AE51 2 tests
beats 102 of 202
51 ≈ average

ride comfort

Yokohama BLUEARTH-A AE50
beats 86 of 134
65 Not measured.
Yokohama AE51
– Not measured.

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.