Continental Premium EcoContact 6
tested only in R16, R17 
noise and comfort: only 20 % measured 
Which sizes it's made in
Select width → profile → rim diameter in turn.
Pre zvolenú kombináciu momentálne nemáme variant. Skúste iný profil alebo priemer ráfika.
Price comparison across shops
Current prices for size 195/65 R15.
Prices are indicative and may differ in the shop. Click to go straight to the product.
How the EcoContact 6 evaluated
tested only in R16, R17 noise and comfort: only 20 % measured incomplete measurement: comfort from noise only 
ranking not certain yet (9.–26.) 
Wet 26 what it consists of Wet (3)
Dry 69 what it consists of Dry (2)
Economy 97 what it consists of Economy (2)
Noise and comfort 58 what it consists of Noise and comfort (1)
Zákaznícke recenzie do PTI nevstupujú – PTI stojí na meraniach nezávislých testov; pri pneumatikách s málo testami čiastočne prihliada aj na triedu značky.
The tyre's real value for money
Lowest price in size 195/65 R15 divided by the estimated mileage from tests and reviews.
Hankook K435 KINERGY ECO2 works out cheaper per 100 km, but has a lower overall score (6,9 vs 7,3).
Technical information
Focus: Eco-standard
The middle ground between economy and an ordinary tyre — Continental EcoContact 6 sits exactly here. The manufacturer aims to keep fuel consumption low without paying for it with the weaker wet behaviour typical of purely economical models. In practice it is a tyre for drivers who cover a lot of kilometres and do not want to give up much safety along the way.
No technologies are listed for this size.
Competitors
Main competitors in the same price range.
How the price has evolved
Lowest price across shops for size 195/65 R15.
The lowest available price across the monitored shops is shown. Indicative; may differ in the shop.
What owners say
<p>After three years of driving , 10,000 km, the tires no longer flake. They have stabilized. The tread depth was 6 mm when new. Now it is 5 mm on the front tires and 5.5 mm on the rear tires..</p>
Hello.
I just had the first service on my SUZUKI VITARA Hybrid 1.4 Style 2025.
I have 20,000 km / 1 year!
The garage noted on the invoice > "front tires to be changed in 5,000 km"!
This means that this set of tires will have lasted ... 25,000 km?
For long-lasting, economical tires - this is not normal.
I change cars every 2 or 3 years (I drive under warranty!) > I have NEVER changed my tires before 50,000 km - even sold the car at ... 60,000 km.
In your opinion, is 25,000 km on this vehicle "normal"?
Thank you.
<p>My recent experience with eco tyres is a bunch of ePrimacy, not on the same car.
Although the 6Q behave as designed on dry roads, I find them noticeably worse than eprimacy everywhere.
The positives: Road noise is very good and highway driving is pleasant on good tarmac, good centering. Consumption is good. They drive well on gravel/dirt and can take a bit of torture with rocks (if that's your thing).
They can also handle the S.European summers, did some 400+km trips @130km/h under 40C ambient, didn't notice anything weird.</p><p>the bad:
The steering feel is bad, I have a floating sensation.
At the slightest drop of water tyres become dangerous.
On bad city roads, ABS kicks in constantly (dry or wet).
I am swapping them out asap, won't drive a second winter on those. imo much worse than eprimacy and even the latter are not good tyres (all eco touring tyres annoy me).</p>
<p>These tyres were factory fitted to my 2023 Suzuki Swace (this is a Toyota Corolla Touring Sports 1.8 hybrid). Very low rolling resistance tyres so they helped with making my car really economical: 4,8 l/100 km. They lasted 65.000 kilometers. My only complaint is the high level of noise from the tyres.
Just replaced them with Michelin Primacy 5 Energy and the Michelins are so much quieter.</p>
<p>Not suited for car and rims.</p>