19 000+ reviews 4 600+ tyres 120+ tests 280 000+ prices tracked
Standard
Firestone Mid-range

WINTERHAWK 3

6.5
Overall score ✓ 4 tyre tests
Rolling resistance Wet grip Noise
3,0
★★★☆☆
6 driver reviews
Price from
in 155/65 R14
Choose your size

Which sizes it's made in

Select width → profile → rim diameter in turn.

1
Widthin millimetres
2
ProfileAspect ratio (%)
3
Rim diameterin inches

We currently don't have a variant for the selected combination.

Where to buy

Price comparison across shops

Vo vašom rozmere 155/65 R14 túto pneumatiku momentálne nepredáva ani jeden zo sledovaných e-shopov.

Nevadí — pozrite si priame alternatívy medzi konkurenciou alebo to, ako pneumatika obstála v testoch.

Rating and verdict

How the Winterhawk 3 evaluated

Skóre vychádza z 4 nezávislých testov a z 8 recenzií vodičov. ?

6.5
Overall score 6,5 / 10 7 disciplín meraných v nezávislých testoch. Recenzie vodičov sa premietajú do celkového skóre.
✓ reliable
60 70 80 90 100
Comfort
Comfort
97,2
Dry
Dry
96,8
Manoeuvring
Manoeuvring
96,2
Snow
Snow
95,4
Braking
Braking
90,8
Wet
Wet
88,7
Value
Value
73
very weak60–81 weaker81–89 average89–93 good93–96 very good96–98 top tier98–100

The number shows what percentage of the best tyre’s performance in the test this tyre achieved in this discipline.

Where it shines
Wet Wet weaker 88,7
Dry Dry very good 96,8
!Where it falls short
Snow Snow good 95,4
Value Value very weak 73
🏆 Trophies from tests calculated from 24 tests
Top 3
Top 3 placement in the test
✓ Characteristics data-driven recommendations
🚗
A balanced choice performance, comfort and price
🛣
For everyday driving city and motorway
M+S
M+S Suitable for mud and snow
3PMSF
3PMSF Certified for winter conditions
Price per 100 km

The tyre's real value for money

97 € ÷ 39 937 km × 100
0,24 € / 100 km

Lowest price in size 155/65 R14 divided by the estimated mileage from tests and reviews.

Comparison with alternatives
Apollo ALNAC 4G WINTER 0,13 €
Falken EUROWINTER HS02 0,15 €
Firestone WINTERHAWK 3 0,24 €

Apollo ALNAC 4G WINTER vychádza lacnejšie na 100 km.

Specifications

Technical information

Our classification not an official manufacturer classification

Focus: Standard

The largest and best-selling category, and Firestone WINTERHAWK 3 belongs to it. No single property is pushed here at the expense of the others — comfort, grip, noise and tread life keep a sensible balance. For most drivers it is the safest bet: the tyre behaves predictably in the dry and in the wet and covers a decent number of kilometres.

Eco
Eco
Eco-standard
Eco-standard
Standard
Standard
Standard-sport
Standard-sport
Sport
Sport
Supersport
Supersport
Selected size 155/65 R14
Width155 mm
Profile height65 %
Rim diameter14″
Load index (LI)75
Speed index (SI)T
Product code6773
EAN3286340677318
EU energy label Rolling resistanceE Wet gripC Noise(71 dB)
Manufacturer Firestone
Tread WINTERHAWK 3
Season Winter
Vehicle type Passenger car
Focus Standard
Construction Radial
Creation date 18.03.2018
Product launch date (gen.) 06.12.2019
Available technologies
M+S Áno - M+S
3PMSF 3PMSF Áno
Comparison

Konkurencia

Hlavní konkurenti v rovnakej cenovej kategórii.

Select a tyre to compare with Firestone WINTERHAWK 3.
Novinka

Nástupca prezeraného modelu

Pneumatika, ktorú si práve pozeráte, už má nástupcu. Odporúčame zvoliť technologicky vyspelejší model:

Price history

How the price has evolved

We don't have price history for this size yet.

User reviews

What owners say

3,0
★★★☆☆
z 6 recenzií
Click to filter reviews
Expected lifespan
39 937 km
Reliability:confidence-high
BA
ba***@zoho.com
Volkswagen T Cross · 225/45 R17 · 19 999 km
★★★★☆

Good looking tyre with reliable grip. I'm a sporty driver, although my car isn't sporty. The tyres give me a good grip, maybe not the best, but i've never felt losing grip while driving. Also in the snow it's very good. I would buy these again!

SV
sv***@gmail.com
Ford Focus MK3 · 205/55 R16 · 6 437 km
★★☆☆☆

Got them as a used set of four. All same age - 2 years. The previous driver seemed to be an honest person. So nothing to say about that.
I was used to having Uniroyals on my previous car. No comparison to them. In dry and wet conditions the tyres are quite all right, but last winter luckily gave us a bit of slush and snow. The car behaved not good. Steering wasn't put through to the road.
I'll buy a pair of new ones soon. It'll not be the Winterhawk 3 again.

VU
vu***@gmail.com
Renault Megane 2 sedan · 195/65 R15 · 40 234 km
★★★★☆

Been driving them around 40 000km (4 winters and 1 summer) on 2 wheel FWD car (1.6 atmo engine, no turbo so no torque). They are a pretty average tire. Handles everything well, master of none. Never got to the max of the tire (I drive 10-20kmh above limit and I'm a steady driver, no sharp turns, heavy braking or hard acceleration ), never had a scary situation, but never also had "wow this tire rocks" moment. It never stuck in the snow, never had problems with aquaplaning or on ice.
I even had it as a summer tyre this year and it still didn't wear (it is a better summer tire than Micheling Energy Saver). I'm currently on 5.5mm of thread which is outstanding. Not sure if its the tire or my suspension on the car, but bot tires (Energy Saver and WinterHawk 3) easily activated the ABS during braking. WinterHawk was little better in braking than the Energy Saver. For instance, on my other car (Skoda Fabia), you could brake harder and stop faster on less known tires (like the Barum Polaris or Bravuris 3HM). Skoda just digged in the asphalt or snow, while on my Megane ABS starts and the braking feeling is not so great. But this are two different cars, Megane is more comfortable than the Å koda but is also way more wallowy as the Å koda is much more direct in steering and grip.
I will replace them with premium All Season tires so will see if its the car or the tires.

SI
si***@gmail.com
Mercedes Benz E220Cdi · 225/45 R17
★☆☆☆☆

Hello, I have Mercdes Benz. I have driven on lot of tyres, winter and summer. This is not my first snow or rain with this car. Firestone Winterhawk 3 is the worst tyre I had opportunity to drive on. On dry roads are relative ok, on wet roads it is better to stay home. On the snow also, like you don't have tyres. One season, around cca 10 000 km passed on these tyre and it will go to rubish... Very expensive tyres, and very bad tyres. I would never buy Firestone again.

IV
iv***@gmail.com
Skoda Octavia · 225/45 R17 · 20 921 km
★★★☆☆

Nothing to impress. It is balanced and affordable tire. Performance on snow is Ok if you drive normally. Dry and wet handling are satisfactory.

Jazdíte na týchto pneumatikách?

Prihláste sa a napíšte recenziu — pomôžete ostatným pri výbere.

Sign in