Hankook Upper mid-range RT03 DYNAPRO MT
Which sizes it's made in
Select width → profile → rim diameter in turn.
We currently don't have a variant for the selected combination.
Price comparison across shops
Vo vašom rozmere 31/11 R15 túto pneumatiku momentálne nepredáva ani jeden zo sledovaných e-shopov.
Nevadí — pozrite si priame alternatívy medzi konkurenciou alebo to, ako pneumatika obstála v testoch.
How the Dynapro MT evaluated
Skóre vychádza z 4 recenzií vodičov. ?
Technical information
Focus: Mud Terrain
Mud-terrain is an unambiguously specialised tyre for heavy going — mud, deep ruts, snow, rocks. Hankook RT03 DYNAPRO MT is one of them. Large tread blocks with deep voids clear themselves and dig in where an ordinary tyre only slips. You pay for it on the road: more noise, less comfort, longer braking distances and higher fuel consumption. If most of your kilometres are on tarmac, this is more tyre than you need.
Konkurencia
Hlavní konkurenti v rovnakej cenovej kategórii.
How the price has evolved
We don't have price history for this size yet.
What owners say
I have been running 285/75/R16 Hankook Dynapro MT tires on my 2.7 ton 1997 Ford Expedition for 5 years now. Almost immediately after buying them, I had the tires siped i.e. cuts about 5-7mm deep made with about 5mm step onto the tire (the edges of the tread were not cut to maintain good directional habits for the tire). In summer, the grip was awesome compared to street or All Terrain, in some situation where the former tires warranted 4wd, the Dynapro Mud Terrain was still good in 2wd, especially on grass or gravel. In shallow mud, the 4wd made the vehicle unstoppable.
On streets I essentially got the stability of a train. Not kidding, my record for the vehicle keeping a lane without me touching the wheel at 40mph is about 2.8km. No problems on tram lines, no issues when tracks have been worn into the asphalt. I have never managed to get these tires to aquaplane, no matter the speed or rainfall. I can also ignore all speed bumps and humps. I can still tell what each of my wheels are doing and can still feel the paint on the pavement through the tires and suspension
Traction on snow and ice was markedly improved after getting the tires siped. I did, and now I've been running siped tires for 5 winters in Eastern Europe. Works perfectly well in loose on in packed snow, even on ice, albeit better in 4wd. It have even used the car to pull trees from the forest in deep snow. In the same snow a Subaru XV on regular Nordic winter tires had real trouble. One year in snowy conditions I briefly had one of the tires on the rear axle siped while the other was not siped, The result was that I was only able to move in 2wd thanks to the limited slip in the rear, so great was the difference in traction between siped and unsiped. Siping is absolutely necessary to run these tires in snow, on ice and generally in winter.
The main downsides are fuel economy and noise. I went from 17.5L/100km to 20L/100km in city by switching from 265/70R17 street tires to these. The tires are most economical at or below 50 mph. At 75-80 the fuel economy rises to 20L/100km on highway. As for noise, similar numbers apply. For newer tires with more tread, about 50mph is the maximum you want to do. With more wear 55-60mph can be tolerated. Beyond 65mph the noise becomes deafening.
Overall, I think for general purpose and off road, this tire size and this tire in particular is perfect for this vehicle, or a vehicle in similar size or weight. I now have about 25k kilometers on the tires and I can see them lasting at least 15k more before they lose their good traction in snow and muddy off road.
Great tyre, when new. Mine are now 2 years old and I'm not sure what's gone on but I think the compound has hardened. Whilst tyre life (in terms of kms) is great, they are now down right dangerous in the wet. Understeering on damp roads, the back now steps out around every corner at slow speeds, I am not game to try at high speeds. Will not buy again.
I've been driving 4x4's now for over 25 years (about 2 million K's) and usually ONLY use BFG's as here in OZ, if your Tyre fails you, you may die out there...
Something to think about?
As this is just a "work" truck I decided mainly on price at the time to get these Hankook MT's
I am impressed with the lack of noise, the wet and dry grip on bitumen is amazing and the life seems very good too.
I've done 40,000klm so far with about 20,000klm left in them and that's very good considering how heavily loaded the Ute is, and how hard I drive it... "After all, Time is Money"
Would I recommend these MT's. Absolutely. An outstanding Tyre for the money.
Have a nice Day.
From the Land of OZ.
I bought a set of the hankook dynapro mt tires in Feb of 2012, I run them on a 04 1/2 ton 2wd suburban with a locker. I have gotten good traction all around, on the road, off the road. I rotate them every 5000 miles when I do my oil change. I am currently running the same tires with with an estimated 5-10,000 miles left to go worth of tread. Currently have over 60,000 miles on them. Starting to get a little uneven wear....But wow! These tires where Worth the $200 a piece I paid for them. I would definitely buy them again.
Jazdíte na týchto pneumatikách?
Prihláste sa a napíšte recenziu — pomôžete ostatným pri výbere.
Sign in