20 000+ reviews 4 600+ tyres 140+ tests 480 000+ prices tracked
Standard-sport
Michelin Premium

PILOT SPORT 4 SUV

9.0
PTI – Pneutesty Index
outstanding ✓ 9 tyre tests
PTI compared with all summer tyres · rank in size 255/50 R19 among 48 available
tested in R19
Price from
178,83 €
in 255/50 R19
Choose your size

Which sizes it's made in

Select width → profile → rim diameter in turn.

1
Widthin millimetres
2
ProfileAspect ratio (%)
3
Rim diameterin inches
4
Load capacityLI index

Load index (LI) — You must keep the LI at least as high as stated in the vehicle registration document for the specific tyre size. A higher LI (load index) is permitted by law.

5
SpeedSI index

Speed index (SI) — For summer tyres, the SI may be higher than stated in the vehicle registration document.

Varianty pneumatiky (3)

Your size 255/50 R19 103Y XL EAN: 3528707955203 SAP: 795520
MICHELIN PILOT SPORT 4 SUV, RP, NE0
Rolling resistanceB Wet gripA NoiseB Price from 178,83 €
OE OE: Porsche Rim protection Rim protection
View prices →
Your size 255/50 R19 103W XL EAN: 3528706492716 SAP: 649271
MICHELIN PILOT SPORT 4 SUV, RP
Rolling resistanceC Wet gripA NoiseB Price from 187,89 €
Rim protection Rim protection
Your size 255/50 R19 107Y XL EAN: 3528700972085 SAP: 97208
MICHELIN PILOT SPORT 4 SUV, RP
Rolling resistanceC Wet gripA NoiseB Price from 195,09 €
Reinforced profile Reinforced profile Rim protection Rim protection
Rating and verdict

How the Pilot Sport 4 SUV evaluated

9.0
PTI – Pneutesty Index 9,0 / 10 · outstanding PTI compared with all summer tyres · rank in size 255/50 R19 among 48 available
tested in R19
Discipline Percentile worsegroup averagebest Gap ⓘ Tests
Wet 99
+7 % 9 tests
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking 97
+12 % 8 tests
Aquaplaning 98
+6 % 8 tests
wet handling 96
+4 % 9 tests
Dry 83
+3 % 8 tests
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking 85
+5 % 8 tests
dry handling 89
+2 % 7 tests
Economy 53
+4 % 8 tests
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption) 19
−6 % 8 tests
durability (wear and abrasion) 87
+36 % 1 test
Noise and comfort 62
≈ average 8 tests
what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)
quietness (measured and subjective noise) 27
≈ average 6 tests
ride comfort 49
Not measured. –
Where it is strong
Wetbetter than 99 %
Drybetter than 83 %
Where it falls behind
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)−6 %
🏆 Trophies from our data
🏆 best in the wet in size 255/50 R19 from 9 testov in the wet
🏆 Test winner 5× 1st place in 5 tests counted in PTI
🏆 Top 3 6× 1st–3rd place in 6 tests counted in PTI

Zákaznícke recenzie do PTI nevstupujú – PTI stojí na meraniach nezávislých testov; pri pneumatikách s málo testami čiastočne prihliada aj na triedu značky.

✓ Characteristics data-driven recommendations
⚡
Balanced performance comfort + dynamics
🚗
For active drivers everyday driving
OE Approved directly by the carmaker
Rim protection
Rim protection Protects the rim from kerbs
Price per 100 km

The tyre's real value for money

179 € ÷ 42 366 km × 100
0,42 € / 100 km

Lowest price in size 255/50 R19 divided by the estimated mileage from tests and reviews.

Comparison with alternatives
Michelin PILOT SPORT 4 SUV 0,42 €
Hankook K117A VENTUS S1 EVO2 SUV 0,46 €

Of the tyres compared, Michelin PILOT SPORT 4 SUV has the lowest cost per 100 km.

Specifications

Technical information

Our classification not an official manufacturer classification

Focus: Standard-sport

A standard tyre with an added dose of sportiness — Michelin PILOT SPORT 4 SUV is one of them. The basis stays balanced: comfort, quietness and tread life at the level of an ordinary tyre. The manufacturer adds a stiffer sidewall or a grippier compound, so the response is sharper at speed and through corners. The ideal is that none of it comes out of the tyre's mileage.

Eco
Eco
Eco-standard
Eco-standard
Standard
Standard
Standard-sport
Standard-sport
Sport
Sport
Supersport
Supersport
Selected size 255/50 R19
Width255 mm
Profile height50 %
Rim diameter19″
Load index (LI)103
Speed index (SI)Y
Product code795520
EAN3528707955203
EU energy label Rolling resistanceB Wet gripA NoiseB (72 dB)
Manufacturer Michelin
Tread PILOT SPORT 4 SUV
Season Summer
Vehicle type SUV / 4×4
Available technologies
OE
Ochrana disku Áno - RP
Comparison

Competitors

Main competitors in the same price range.

Select a tyre to compare with Michelin PILOT SPORT 4 SUV.
Test history

Which tests it appeared in

Total tests 3×
Wins 1×
Top 3 1×
Average placement 4,0
2026
5. place
Auto Bild Test letných SUV pneumatík 255/45 R19 2026
9 tyres
Detail →
2023
1. place
Auto Bild Test letných SUV pneumatík 225/65 R17 2023
12 tyres
Detail →
6. place
Auto Motor und Sport Summer Tire Test 255/45 R20 2023
10 tyres ·Premiere
Detail →
Price history

How the price has evolved

Lowest price across shops for size 255/50 R19.

Current lowest
178,83 €
↗ 1,60 % more expensive
Lowest for the period
175,32 €
9.9.2026
Highest for the period
178,83 €
14.10.2026
178,83 175,32 178,83 € 22.6.2026 14.10.2026 22.6.2026: 176,01 € 29.6.2026: 178,10 € 6.7.2026: 176,01 € 21.8.2026: 178,10 € 9.9.2026: 175,32 € 21.9.2026: 178,10 € 24.9.2026: 175,32 € 8.10.2026: 178,10 € 14.10.2026: 178,83 €

The lowest available price across the monitored shops is shown. Indicative; may differ in the shop.

User reviews

What owners say

4,1
★★★★☆
from 32 reviews
Click to filter reviews
Expected lifespan
42 366 km
Reliability:confidence-high
17
17***@noreg.com
Honda CRV · 235/55 R19 · 80 467 km
★★★☆☆

<p>For some reason I experienced lots of tyre roar from the PS4 SUV tyres despite rotation and alignment. In the end i waited for the MyCar Black Friday sale and got a set of Pirelli's in 19 inch and no more tyre noise. Maybe just unlucky but every Michelin i have purchased, i've always had noticeable tyre roar. Have stayed away from them and leaned towards Bridgestone and Pirelli for now.</p>

GR
gr***@gmail.com
Audi · 235/45 R21 · 24 140 km
★★★★☆

This review is intended to be a comparison of the same tyre on different cars, having experienced a full set of PS4 SUV with my previous Q5 from start to end. In this case, I progressively installed a front pair (due to a front puncture of the OE tyres), then a rear pair (due to wear of the OE tyres) on my Q4 e-tron which I have had for about 2 years. So this is for anyone cross-referencing the same tyre but who would like to find out the difference between a regular car and an EV.
Usually, SUVs come with regular tyres, some sporty but most of them are SUV-fitted tyres. My previous full set of PS4 SUV on the Q5 was preceded by the OE, then Latitude Sport. I found the improvement from one to the other very good, and never once was fuel consumption questioned because the figures were similar.
However, this time, I have progressively installed summer performance SUV tyres on my EV over the original EV-specific tyres (Turanza Eco). As Jon has highlighted before, the half-half setup of front performance and rear EV-specific tyres gave rise to a fun (but technically less safe) oversteering car which did not impact the energy consumption too much. I was getting about 6.4km/kWh for the first 10000km with full EV tyres, then about 5.9-6.1km/kWh for about 20000km on the mixed setup, which has gone down to 5.5-5.7km/kWh on the full PS4 SUV setup.
Apart from the figures, I feel that my Q4 e-tron is not rolling as efficiently as before as the tyres just feel a bit heavier. I'm jabbing at the accelerator fractionally longer, and not getting the same about of regeneration. Numerically, going from 6.4 down to 5.7 is not a great deal (just 10%), it does bother me as a numbers person. Over time, my decision to prioritise a higher performing tyre is going to cost me a bit more in the wallet. However, it also took a little bit of fun away from getting good consumption numbers to which I will have to get used to during the life of this tyre, which I expect to last at least 35000km. So far the fronts have eked out 20000km and the tread is still looking good, while the new rears have done less than 1000km.
At the speeds I'm allowed to drive, which is less than 100km/h, with frequent tropical rain, I don't think that my car really needs the full PS4 performance, and I'm thinking of switching to the PS5 Energy when the time is up for this set. I mean, it still feels great on the road, the grip is fantastic, and the braking is really stable and straight, but I'm not sure they are a good match for an EV.
Overall, these are great tyres. If consumption or rolling resistance is not your priority, they are still suitable for EVs. However, if you are an EV driver and want to save on costs and can give up a bit of grip for an EV-specific tyre which will perform almost similarly, you will be rewarded with exactly that.

QW
qw***@163.com
245/45 R20 · 96 561 km
★★★★☆

General Performance & Longevity
Mileage & Age: Purchased in September 2021, production date 0521. Currently at 95,000 km.
Driving Style: Mostly gentle driving, with occasional hard acceleration when necessary.
Dry/Wet: Surprisingly good grip in the rain; not prone to hydroplaning.
Comfort: Noise and comfort levels are acceptable/average.
️ Winter Performance (Latitude 40°N)
Conditions: Average winter temp of -7°C.
Traction: As expected for non-winter tires, they struggle significantly on snow ("sliding for sure").
Braking: Noticeable increase in braking distance in cold weather. I actually had a minor rear-end collision due to extended braking distance, costing me $50 in damages.
️ Durability & Weaknesses
Sidewall: The sidewalls are quite soft. This is the tire's biggest weakness.
Damage: I have scrapped 2 tires due to curb rash. One had exposed cords, and the other had a direct puncture in the sidewall.
Aging: The tread is now showing fine cracks (or weather cracks), likely accelerated by the freezing winter temperatures.
Verdict
After 5 years, they are definitely due for replacement. While the longevity is impressive, the soft sidewalls and lack of cold-weather braking safety are significant downsides.
Maybe I should repace a all season tyre.

JO
jo***@hampshire-commodities.co.uk
Lexus RX450H+ · 235/50 R21 · 322 km
★★★★★

My Lexus RX 450H+ came with Dunlop SP Sport Max fitted from new and the fronts have lasted a little over 18,000 miles getting to the wear indicator, the rears having around 5mm tread left but one of the rears had a bubble on the inner sidewall hence, the decision to change all 4 with Michelin offering £100 cash back making them good value compared to Bridgestone and Dunlop. Not many other brands offering this Tyre size from stock.
The Dunlop's never felt sure footed in the wet, they weren't bad but neither were they good however, in colder wet conditions the front would lose grip quite easily and living in the UK, these are very often the conditions we find ourselves in.
The Pilot Sport 4 SUV tyres immediately sound a little quieter which is a nice surprise but the main advantage being the front end has more authority, turn in is a little sharper and there is a smidge better feel through the steering wheel.
Wet grip is vastly improved over the Dunlop's, accelerating from rest in damp conditions results in front end traction that the Dunlop couldn't handle unless being easier with throttle input.
In all, while I can't yet provide any feedback on longevity, I am much happier with the Michelin's.

TO
to***@gmail.com
Land Rover Freelander 2 · 285/60 R18 · 8 047 km
★★★★☆

Replacing Pirelli Scorpions, the Michelins are a definite step up. In the dry the steering is far more precise, grip levels high and behavior at the limit clean and benign. Stopping distances are commendably short with excellent stability. If anything they are even more impressive in the wet with exceptionally strong lateral grip and progressive behavior at the limit. They are very resistant to
aquaplaning on flooded motorways. Road noise and rolling comfort are good but not exceptional. As I use extreme winter tyres
for half the year I have no idea how they would fare in snow or ice although they show commendably good behavior in low
temperatures unlike some summer tyres. So far they are wearing well. For on road use in above freezing conditions I strongly
recommend these tyres as being worth the high price and would happily buy again.

Do you drive on these tyres?

Sign in and write a review — you'll help others choose.

Sign in