20 000+ reviews 4 600+ tyres 140+ tests 470 000+ prices tracked
Sport
Kumho Mid-range

ECSTA PS72 SPORT S

8.5 Excellent
PTI – Pneutesty Index
✓ 4 tyre tests
PTI compared with all summer tyres · rank in size 315/35 R20 among 31 available
PTI −0,3 from brand class tested only in R19
Price from
212,46 €
in 315/35 R20
Choose your size

Which sizes it's made in

Select width → profile → rim diameter in turn.

1
Widthin millimetres
2
ProfileAspect ratio (%)
3
Rim diameterin inches
4
Load capacityLI index

Load index (LI) — You must keep the LI at least as high as stated in the vehicle registration document for the specific tyre size. A higher LI (load index) is permitted by law.

5
SpeedSI index

Speed index (SI) — For summer tyres, the SI may be higher than stated in the vehicle registration document.

Varianty pneumatiky (1)

Your size 315/35 R20 110Y XL EAN: 8808956610142 SAP: 2363573
KUMHO ECSTA PS72 SPORT S
Rolling resistanceC Wet gripA NoiseB Price from 212,46 €
Reinforced profile Reinforced profile Suitable for EVs Suitable for EVs
View prices →
Rating and verdict

How the Ecsta Sport S PS72 evaluated

8.5 Excellent
PTI – Pneutesty Index 8,5 / 10 PTI compared with all summer tyres · rank in size 315/35 R20 among 31 available
PTI −0,3 from brand class tested only in R19 noise and comfort: only 65 % measured incomplete measurement: no wear measurement wear not measured ranking not certain yet (5.–17.)
✓ Disciplíny
Wet z 13 meraní · 4 testy
beats 31 of 40
79 +6,0 %
Rozpad disciplíny „Wet“
wet braking 4 testy
beats 30 of 40
92 +13,7 %
Aquaplaning 2 testy
beats 20 of 32
69 +2,9 %
wet handling 3 testy
beats 23 of 35
85 +3,4 %
Dry z 9 meraní · 4 testy
beats 33 of 40
84 +3,4 %
Rozpad disciplíny „Dry“
dry braking 4 testy
beats 33 of 40
95 +6,9 %
dry handling 4 testy
beats 23 of 34
90 +2,1 %
Economy z 2 meraní · 2 testy bez opotrebenia
beats 9 of 33
29 −4,2 %
Rozpad disciplíny „Economy“
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption) 2 testy
beats 4 of 33
9 −11,4 %
Noise and comfort z 3 meraní · 3 testy
beats 22 of 33
68 ≈ average
Rozpad disciplíny „Noise and comfort“
quietness (measured and subjective noise) 3 testy
beats 11 of 32
29 ≈ average
ride comfort
beats 24 of 30
75 Not measured.
slabé 0+ slabšie 25+ priemerné 45+ dobré 60+ veľmi dobré 80+ špička 92+
✓ Silná a slabá stránka
Silná
Dry 84 % Wet 79 %
Zaostáva
Economy worse than 71 %
🏆 Trophies from our data
🏆 Test winner 1× 1st place in 1 test counted in PTI
🏆 Top 3 2× 1st–3rd place in 2 tests counted in PTI

Customer reviews are not part of PTI – PTI is based on measurements from independent tests; for tyres with few tests it also partly considers the brand's class.

✓ Characteristics data-driven recommendations
🏁
For dynamic driving precise steering
🌀
Stable in corners high grip
Reinforced profile
Reinforced profile Higher load capacity at higher pressure
Suitable for EVs
Suitable for EVs Reinforced for EV weight and torque

Where Kumho ECSTA PS72 SPORT S stands in size 315/35 R20

Compared with 17 tyres in this size — same season and focus. All are on offer and have results from independent tests.

5. rank in the group of 17 compared
+0,4 above the group median group median 8,1
−1,3 behind the best in the group the best has 9,8
Show all tyres in the ranking (17)
  1. 1. 9.8 Hankook K137A VENTUS EVO SUV 271,42 € +58,96 €
  2. 2. 9.6 Goodyear EAGLE F1 ASYMMETRIC 6 279,71 € +67,25 €
  3. 3. 9.3 Michelin PILOT SPORT 4 359,02 € +146,56 €
  4. 4. 8.8 Bridgestone POTENZA SPORT EVO 290,49 € +78,03 €
  5. 5. 8.5 Bridgestone POTENZA SPORT 282,41 € +69,95 €
  6. 5. 8.5 Kumho ECSTA PS72 SPORT S This tyre 212,46 €
  7. 7. 8.4 Hankook K127A VENTUS S1 EVO3 SUV 213,07 € +0,61 €
  8. 8. 8.2 Pirelli P-ZERO (PZ4) S.C. 298,72 € +86,26 €
  9. 9. 8.1 Vredestein ULTRAC PRO 230,80 € +18,34 €
  10. 10. 7.9 Kumho PS71 SUV 191,81 € −20,65 €
  11. 11. 7.7 Nexen N'FERA SPORT 177,30 € −35,16 €
  12. 12. 7.6 Goodyear EAGLE F1 (ASYMMETRIC) 3 SUV 268,74 € +56,28 €
  13. 12. 7.6 Toyo PROXES SPORT 2
  14. 14. 7.4 Continental CONTISPORTCONTACT 5 307,63 € +95,17 €
  15. 15. 7.3 Yokohama V107 321,25 € +108,79 €
  16. 16. 7.0 Pirelli PZERO
  17. 17. 6.2 Yokohama V105 241,77 € +29,31 €
Specifications

Technical information

Our classification not an official manufacturer classification

Focus: Sport

With sport tyres, grip in every situation is what decides — under hard acceleration, under braking, in the dry and in the wet. Kumho ECSTA PS72 SPORT S belongs to this group. Stability at higher speeds and precision through corners come on top of that. One thing drivers often underestimate when buying: grip comes from a softer compound, and a softer compound wears faster. Where a standard tyre covers roughly 40,000 km, a sport tyre manages about 20,000 to 30,000 km — and considerably less with a sharper driving style or a heavier, more powerful car.

Eco
Eco
Eco-standard
Eco-standard
Standard
Standard
Standard-sport
Standard-sport
Sport
Sport
Supersport
Supersport
Selected size 315/35 R20
Width315 mm
Profile height35 %
Rim diameter20″
Load index (LI)110
Speed index (SI)Y
Product code2363573
EAN8808956610142
EU energy label Rolling resistanceC Wet gripA NoiseB (74 dB)
Manufacturer Kumho
Tread ECSTA PS72 SPORT S
Season Summer
Vehicle type Passenger car
Available technologies
Zosilený profil Áno
Vhodné pre elektro Áno - EV
Comparison

Competitors

Main competitors in the same price range.

Select a tyre to compare with Kumho ECSTA PS72 SPORT S.
Test history

Which tests it appeared in

Total tests 3×
Wins 1×
Top 3 2×
Average placement 2,7
2026
2. place
Top Tire Review Test letných UUHP pneumatík 255/35 R19 2026
3 tyres
Detail →
5. place
AutoBild Summer Sports Tire Test 255/35 R19 2026
8 tyres
Detail →
2025
1. place
Tire Rack Summer Tire Test 275/35 R19 2025
10 tyres ·Premiere
Detail →
Price history

How the price has evolved

Lowest price across shops for size 315/35 R20.

Current lowest
212,46 €
↗ 2,18 % more expensive
Lowest for the period
207,93 €
22.6.2026
Highest for the period
218,54 €
10.10.2026
218,54 207,93 212,46 € 22.6.2026 23.10.2026 22.6.2026: 207,93 € 22.7.2026: 216,43 € 2.8.2026: 214,25 € 3.8.2026: 208,29 € 8.8.2026: 214,25 € 10.8.2026: 208,29 € 15.8.2026: 214,25 € 17.8.2026: 208,29 € 22.8.2026: 214,25 € 24.8.2026: 208,29 € 29.8.2026: 214,25 € 31.8.2026: 208,29 € 5.9.2026: 214,25 € 7.9.2026: 208,29 € 12.9.2026: 214,25 € 14.9.2026: 208,29 € 19.9.2026: 214,25 € 21.9.2026: 212,46 € 24.9.2026: 208,29 € 26.9.2026: 214,25 € 28.9.2026: 208,29 € 3.10.2026: 214,25 € 5.10.2026: 208,29 € 8.10.2026: 212,46 € 10.10.2026: 218,54 € 12.10.2026: 212,46 € 17.10.2026: 218,54 € 19.10.2026: 212,46 € 23.10.2026: 212,46 €

The lowest available price across the monitored shops is shown. Indicative; may differ in the shop.

User reviews

What owners say

4,1
★★★★☆
from 9 reviews
Click to filter reviews
JO
jo***@gmail.com
Mazda 6 Series · 225/45 R17 · 4 828 km
★★★★☆

<p>Kumho's feel very sporty and grippy, as they should. Sidewall is quite stiff for a road tire. Dry grip is awesome and should be more than enough for normal driving in traffic, even for spirited drivers. Wet grip also very good, I've never had any issues in the rain with these. (Yes, they are new tires.) Only downside is road noise which is not their best quality, but noise is not very loud, maybe average in their class.</p><p>Car came with almost new Minerva F205's and Kumho's beat these in every category hands on. Kumho is excellent tire and I highly recommend this. True value for money as they are cheaper than competitors (Michelin, Continental, etc) but offer same quality and driving characteristics.</p><p>I mostly drive city traffic and motorway in mixed conditions sun or rain.</p>

WI
wi***@gmail.com
BMW E39 540i · 265/35 R18 · 1 609 km
★★★★☆

Got the normal PS72 for the front (235/40-18) and PS72 S for the rears without knowing. Apparently you can't get the normal PS72 in 265/35-18. The S has a much stiffer sidewall. So far very impressed by the comfort and wet grip. The combination works, but the fronts are definitely leaning more toward comfort with sluggish turn in as a result. The rears are good even in 5 c and rain. However one tyre took 150 grams when balancing! Shop confirmed it is the tyre and not wheel. Not noticing any vibrations as reported by others, but I will keep an eye on this and re balance in a couple of months. Might be due to improper storage (tyres dated 47th week 2024). Feels like a solid tyre, but Kumho quality control is still a valid concern.

V.
v.***@live.com.au
Audi S3 · 225/40 R18 · 11 265 km
★★★★☆

A little bit noisier on the road but beat my previous pilot sport 4S on traction. Excellent grip in the dry with minimal slip on a Stage 2+ Audi S3 even when launching.
Do not get the non 'S' variant - was fitted by accident at the tyre shop, had to return them within 48h, they have terrible grip.

MA
ma***@gmail.com
Porsche 718 GTS · 275/35 R20 · 1 368 km
★★★☆☆

I use my car for sport driving only on deserted roads so I should preface this review with the knowledge that they have a short life especially on the rear.
Most of the 800 miles have been in wet/damp or drying conditions.
Tread depth shocked me as they are down to 4mm already.
I have no complaints about the grip, they have excellent traction in wet conditions so I have no doubt the same applies to dry.
I can’t comment on steering feel etc as they are only on the rears.

M3
m3***@arcor.de
Ford Mustang · 275/35 R20 · 6 437 km
★★★★☆

I am driving these tires in the dimensions 265/35 R20 at the front and 275/35 R20 at the rear on my 2020 Ford Mustang GT.
Since I previously had 19" rims, I had to look for new tires. The Kumho Ecsta Sport S came out this year and piqued my interest, especially since Kumho promised many improvements over the PS91.
Since the price was very reasonable and the preliminary tests available at the time were all positive, I ultimately decided on the Kumhos.
What was noticable was the very stiff sidewall. I can almost put my entire weight (~90 kg) on the tire without it being pressed down.
Once it was fitted, I immediately noticed the very precise and direct steering response, and that the tyre is relatively comfortable despite its 20-inch size and sporty design.
The grip level with this tire is very high, regardless of whether it is dry or wet, and it conveys confidence in the car at all times.
The noise level is unobtrusive, and even potholes are well filtered.
So, everything is great? There is one point where I am absolutely disappointed, and that is wear.
When new, the tire has a tread depth of 7.1 mm, and after approx. 6500 km (~4000 miles), despite mostly calm driving (no racetrack), there is only just 5 mm of tread left at the rear and approx. 5.2 mm at the front. Since I run the tires down to a maximum of 3.0 mm for safety reasons, this means that the tires would not even last 15,000 km (assuming linear wear). The Michelin Pilot Sport 4s lasted for around 40,000 km (~25,000 mls) and still had over 4 mm of tread left!
This is truly devastating. Even though they cost only half as much as Michelin tires, I would have liked to see a higher mileage.
I don't know yet whether I will buy these tires again. The tire itself is really great, but the wear ruins the overall impression.
I am not yet certain whether I would purchase this tyre again. On the one hand, it is incredibly enjoyable and gives the Mustang a significantly more direct and enjoyable driving experience while maintaining a high level of driving safety. On the other hand, the wear is abnormally high, which is definitely something to consider. My decision will depend on which alternative tyres are available on the market when these tyres are worn out.

Do you drive on these tyres?

Sign in and write a review — you'll help others choose.

Sign in